No where is "MOST LIKELY" to survive after Nuclear war. If the bombs don't get you, the after effects will.

@MrOobling: Maybe not in total luxury, but the natives did it for centuries before the White man came.

LA
NYC

Probably the two best cities to head to when nuclear war is imminent

I'd bet on SE America where there's a fair amount of bomb shelters left over from the cuban missile crisis, paranoid gun toting right win radicals keeping them fully supplied and not enough large cities to motivate a direct nuclear strike from anyone that would want to reach it.

Another save heaven is an empire build IN the ocean and to live of seafood and oxigen made from water.



Radiation in water

Most remote islands such as Polynesia would be safe. They survived for thousands of years in isolation before, they can do it again. Central Africa would be safe because who gives a shit about them? Antarctica would also be safe.
Also another misconception is about the radiation. Here's something for you fucking idiots who think avoiding radiation is as important as the initial blast. RADIATION IS NOWHERE NEAR AS DANGEROUS AS AN EXPLOSION RELEASING AS MUCH ENERGY AS A HURRICANE. Here's a statistic. Let's assume Hiroshima gets nuked again. Now, the initial blast would maybe kill a few hundred thousand depending upon the size of the bomb. But the amount of people who would die of cancer because of the bomb to the amount of people who would get non related cancer anyway is 1:20. This means that before, 100% of the people who will get cancer will get cancer. But after the bomb it's only 105%. And oh, you think drinking radiated water is bad? Well I'm not physicist, but I'm sure it would increase your risk of cancer by less than 0.1%

Here's another country: the U.S.. Yes. The US will most likely lose less than 5% of its population. Figure that one out on your own

I figured it out. Here is the answer.

The quality of mercy is not strain'd.
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest:
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.

Nice quote

Lucid, you agree with Skourby?

Also, I have a whole quote book full of these good quotes. Here is another:

Have mercy upon us miserable sinners.

Common Prayer Book (English Church)

Edited 3/6/2015 05:00:31

If the question was asking about World War III rather than nuclear war specifically, Switzerland would be a safe bet.

Switzerland has a great track record with World Wars. :P

Dah...

Noone realises that Switzerland considered building an atom bomb until the 80s!

By the way, my top three:

http://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/world/03/nuclear_powers/html/india.stm

Edited 3/6/2015 12:41:24

Lucid do you agree with skourby


On what?

That US would be scot-free from a nuclear attack.

Ha US would be screwed. But he ment small towns and cabins and crap like that.

Only in Alaska...

Alaska can be easily reached by Russia and N.Korean missiles