<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 30 of 84   1  2  3  Next >>   
angry members: 8/8/2013 00:12:45

Ryan
Level 47
Report
i see that most of the members are mad that players get benefits they did not earlier i can see why they are mad but it still seams somewhat selfish to complain because someone gets something you have and they didnt have it before you didnt lose anything so why does this bother you im sorry if this came across mean i didnt intend it to im just disaponted iguess
angry members: 8/8/2013 00:42:08

JSA 
Level 59
Report
I have actually not heard any members complain about it and I personally don't have a problem with it. Which members did you hear these complaints from?
angry members: 8/8/2013 02:32:31


Pushover 
Level 59
Report
A few complained on the forum, perhaps a vocal minority...
angry members: 8/8/2013 02:43:48


Knoebber 
Level 54
Report
Learn to punctuation pls.
angry members: 8/8/2013 07:14:21


skunk940 
Level 58
Report
Nope I have nothing wrong with it.
angry members: 8/8/2013 07:34:17


Tim (TIM CLAN) 😡 
Level 61
Report
I dont care either, only the ads really matter.
its worth the price just for that.
angry members: 8/8/2013 08:21:38


ps 
Level 60
Report
i've only seen one complaint of that on the forums, and it was coming from a points level farmer, which indicated a big flaw on his argumentative capacity.
angry members: 8/8/2013 08:36:09


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
If you are talking about me ps you should know I only farmed for two days for a similar reason to JSA; to get a decent, respectable level.
angry members: 8/8/2013 08:59:53


KleinerSteiner
Level 19
Report
...are you saying level 6 is not a respectable level??
angry members: 8/8/2013 09:35:41


Pink 
Level 60
Report
Actually i believe most of us kind of support the system but believe it may be improved. But you laos have to understand that if we payed for this we might want to have some advantage (which i suppose will come on higher levels. But most of the older memebrs arent all that concerned about it because one of the main reasons we bought membership was to support the site
angry members: 8/8/2013 09:41:10


hedja 
Level 58
Report
Ryan, many members are annoyed because they bought the membership within the timeframe of a month before 2.0. Had we not used this $30 we would have unlocked most of the features people buy memberships for. I was just hoping that because there was so much hype about 2.0 beforehand that members would get more things as well, at the moment it seems we can get to 40 players in a game and local deployment, both of which might be unlock-able by non-members.
angry members: 8/8/2013 09:44:50


ps 
Level 60
Report
if you must know i was refering to paperhat
angry members: 8/8/2013 09:59:00


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
I'm glad I could support the site (I'm never going to ask for a refund or something) but one of the reasons I bought membership was for the extra features. Now, non-members can obtain those previously exclusive features (albeit with a lot of playing). If the player limit and local deployment are open for non-members too (and if they are unlockable at a certain level, than I'm 99% sure it will be for all players), I can't help but feel Fizzer has robbed members of their privileges.
angry members: 8/8/2013 10:58:20


ps 
Level 60
Report
i don't feel robbed. i would have felt robbed if i wouldn't be able to disable the popup ads though.

do you even know _what_ non-members can now unlock and _when_ ? maybe it's too much of a hassle that some of them will actually want to pay for skipping it. or if they don't they'll see enough ads to be worth it by the time they get their damn forsaken 24 player diplos.
angry members: 8/8/2013 11:19:27


Pink 
Level 60
Report
we dont knwo ti yet, but im supposign members will eb able to get to 40 while non.mebers will stop at 24, anyway, lest wait and see
angry members: 8/8/2013 11:22:28


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
Robbed is probably too strong a word to describe it. I do think it is unfair though if there are no member exclusive features (which there probably aren't). If you can unlock extra players through levels, it is probable (if not certain) that non-members can get it. Same goes for local deployment.

If what I said above is true, than all members get is the ability to turn ads off. Most apps offer the same for 99p. Other games offer a membership deal for extra features (+the ability to turn off ads).
angry members: 8/8/2013 12:34:05


ps 
Level 60
Report
I do think it is unfair if there are no member exclusive features


There are other member exclusive features beyond being able to disable the ads. Read the 2.0 update posts for details.
angry members: 8/8/2013 12:38:31


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
Unfortunately I have no idea what you mean. Could you quote from those posts?
angry members: 8/8/2013 13:23:20


powerpos
Level 48
Report
Arun you were complaining about this yesterday as well, and the only thing you are complaining about is that certain features MIGHT BE unlockable for non-members.
Since i don't want to go into other people's fantasies, i shall present a few facts instead:

Non-members can create tournaments, still with non-member settings.
Non-members can invite up to 10 players to their games.(compared to 40 for members)
Non-mebers can not change luck, rounding order, move order in their games NOR can they join a CLOT-ladder(are there even any running?) that uses any of these settings, they 're still lower priority for the server and have to watch ads.
There is a chance that some of the luck/rounding order/move order become available for non-members as they level up, but it seems unlikely that all three become available.

Nobody but Fizzer knows whether local deployment is member-exclusive or not.
angry members: 8/8/2013 13:31:04


Pink 
Level 60
Report
do you want to see na angry member? just suicide on me in a ffa agme
angry members: 8/8/2013 13:33:21


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
Members cannot create games with 40 players. They may be able to if they level up enough, but so can non-members. Same goes for local deployment (if it were members only it wouldn't be unlockable it would be there already for members).

Same probably goes for luck/move order. The point is we don't know, but it seems pretty likely and if so, my points stand.
angry members: 8/8/2013 13:35:40

Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged
Level 38
Report
Non-members can invite up to 10 players to their games.(compared to 40 for members)

That number is higher. I can make 12 player games. I believe I unlocked it at level 18.

I still cannot change kill rate or implement wastelands.
angry members: 8/8/2013 13:36:19

Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged
Level 38
Report
Arun, your point is based entirely upon unfounded assumptions.
angry members: 8/8/2013 14:03:18


powerpos
Level 48
Report
Hmm, i'm curious what the new max. is for non-members then, though i must say i was already pleased with being able to make 8-player games.
It might be 22 since 6(standard) + 16 (added new max. for members that they have to level to unlock) is 22 together, although that # seems high to me.

Arun - it seems to me you're just looking for something to complain about, so here:
You're right, you got screwed over by Fizzer and should sell your account to someone for 20$
then make a new free account and just unlock everything with leveling up.
angry members: 8/8/2013 14:17:43


Ironheart
Level 53
Report
powerneg non members can make up to 12 player games, i can but i haven't even used my tournament and more players priviledges yet.
angry members: 8/8/2013 14:38:50


Pink 
Level 60
Report
arun, we already said this several times, try to get it: what we are trying to say si that probably non-members wont eb abel to get the 40 players agmes even with levels, those things will only be unlocked to members... but we also dont know it, as you also dont, but it seems likely to be this way
angry members: 8/8/2013 14:40:04


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
And what I'm saying is that you are wrong. If it is unlockable by level, than it will be for everyone.
angry members: 8/8/2013 14:45:28

Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged
Level 38
Report
Player A - I assume that X is true

Player B - You're wrong. X is clearly wrong and Y is obviously true. I know this because I assume it is true so it must be!

Player A - Nuh-uh! Your assumption is wrong and MY assumption is right! Duh. How hard is that to understand?


Your both making baseless assumptions and acting like they are absolute truths. Stop being such kneebiters.
angry members: 8/8/2013 15:13:18


Pink 
Level 60
Report
wowbagger, you are completely wrong, both our assumptions are based....
angry members: 8/8/2013 15:19:41


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
On what Pink? Based on another player's whim from what I've seen. Wowbagger is on the money. Nobody knows, we'll just have to see.
Posts 1 - 30 of 84   1  2  3  Next >>