perhaps a ranged type army as a custom setting?

Banning all the kids and trolls. (Psst, I have few suggestions)

The clan system is easily the weakest part of WZ and the part that has remained unchanged since clans were first introduced. And even then Clans were just a improvement on what players were already doing by putting clan tags in their names.

-There is no way to rank clans on the clan page other than by total points. We could be able to rank clans by number of active players (logged on in the last 30 days), ladder trophies, Discord members (if Clans linked their Discord). and activity (total points gained in the last 30 days).

-Manager rights are either all or nothing. Need the ability to gradually increase the abilities of sub-admins. See other recommendations in this thread.

If you were a new player and you took a look at the clan list for 5 minutes you would see that the clan with the most players was at the top, and ones with few players at the bottom. Therefore you would discover that Darklords is the most successful clan. Darklordio could go inactive for years (and he has in the past) and his clan still appears at the top of the clan page.

I agree with you Rogue NK.

To add onto the comments made by Rogue.

-I think there's plenty of potential to expand on the clan system. Maybe there can be some sort of clan conflict, where clans pool together x amount of coins and fight it out. Similar to clan league, only this time it's a head to head between 2 clans, and there are coins at stake. Maybe instead of coins, losing clan needs to change their icon to whatever winning clan desires for a period of time. Plenty of options as to what winning clan receives.

-Make stalling a bannable offence.

https://www.warzone.com/Forum/36377-clanlist-rank-work
It's old, but still valid.

Make stalling a bannable offence.

The problem is, it's difficult to clearly define what is stalling and what is not. Changing how the ladder actually works would be much better, since you don't have to worry about banning people, because stalling wouldn't give more points, period.

2 ideas:

• Games come in batches of the size you want (like "5 games at a time", but instead it's "batches of 5"). You have to finish the current batch before receiving your next games.
  
• https://www.warzone.com/Forum/43257-gaming-ladder-more here's an idea from Krzysztof: you can only commit the games it's been your turn for the longest.
  

One of these ideas combined with a better rating system than BayesElo, like Glicko 2, could really make the ratings more accurate and difficult to manipulate.

Banning all the kids and trolls. (Psst, I have a few suggestions)

What are your suggestions lol? @berdan131

@Viking Ok, when I snap my fingers half of the players should be banned to restore balance to the universe. First we could ban Fizzer to take over and establish new order. The rest is 50/50.

Increase number of players in a game to the number of colors.

Create more opportunities for Clans to battle each other in a team setting.

8v8 or 9v9 maybe? Perhaps a Clan ladder with such a format.

I think that would showcase the best Clans as a true team, more so than the Clan Leagues.

CFB Juno is just looking to take on other Clans, 9v9! Message me!