yeah, most of the #Elite! guys boost their stats that way by playing versus people that are low skilled. Most of them are only average or just above average skilled while their stats would say otherwise

ahh sorry ska......i thought it was at least 400....

This is how Optin have more wins than loses.

He simply hosts this map and take the bonuses. And this map really sucks. There are lot of people whose native language is not english so this kind of maps are confusing. So it is like cheating (use confusing maps to get more bonuses)

Once I said in public chat that let's take stratetic positions. After that Optim terminated the game lol. Optim Elite, we do not like you anymore.

I ALWAYS DISLIKE PEOPLE THAT DO THIS..... DON'T PLAY EUROPE COMPLEX IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT COMPLETELY AND NEVER MAKE POSTS ON THIS....

STRATEGIC POINTS!!!!
now you know

Awesome guy:

No need to shout :)

But I think if you limit the players to only inexperienced players then it's less fair to assume that not all of them will understand the intricacies of as you called 'Real Life Europe' a "Complex" map.

EDIT:
*assume that all of them*

@envearoment most elite guys have high stats because are better than you, Do not lie...., if you think you're better than us, join ladder, or play agains us....is childish to say that we play against opponents of low-level, my games are in europe at least with 40%, 45% or 55%....and i never seen players like gnuffone , darkw1ng, idfdoggy, ottarin play in games with low wins rate .....if you have see them or me pls link here the games or dont be stupid with yours affermations......some #Elite! maybe is not very elite but i dont see any problem in this.....about optim, yes its stupid play with at most 400 games played, but i know him, he is more better than you , and i dont consider a ffa a competitive game and for this i dont kick him out of the clan...

I have bad opinion about Optim#Elite!, he always run from games with me

HHH, given his prereqs that is no surprise.

Really no justification for having such limitations other than wanting easy victories. It would be one thing if he offered to train/teach them but he did not appear to do so.

I like a lot of elite players and they are always good to play with ... but I must back up your comment about optim Heyheuhei he's given me one loss through running too quickly - even after he suddenly surrendered (upon hand breaking his iceland bonus early) the other team still thought they we're losing/the game was losable (We voted). And an easy victory from him surrendering abruptly. So I don't play with him anymore.

But also as Belzebub says gnuffone, darkw1ng etc are good opponents and better team-mates.

i can't understand why people would want to play against bad players ... it's so pathetic.

i expect beelzebu is the same, with his 98% wins on 1v1. unless he is by far the greatest player on warlight, he's probably gaming the ratio system somehow.

^^ ha so upon reflection he did not cost me a loss - but probably a victory. My mistake.

I have considered running from Heyheuhei a few times, but it wasn't because of Warlight... >.>

@X ahahah all knows that the 90% of my 1v1 are played in eu rl.....and evreux have make a tournament in eu rl with only good players for try to search "some competition" but i don have see better players of those i usually play.....and you also have lost like a noob vs me and gnuffone on this template....anyway im started to play in 1v1 strategic m earth, i have not completed 15 games yet but my rating in ladder is 2012....your rating is 1503 and your best rating ever is 1851 LoL? are you jealous of this? or you just cry cause we have destroyed you in clan tournament?? loser.....

1 - You have no rating until you have completed 15 games. Before that time there is insufficient data to compute an accurate rating and ay score is meaningless.

2 - Bragging about ladder results? Really? You that much of a child?

Sort of changing the subject, but can I see the link to that tournament? The one you destroyed x in.

Also Richard is right on both accounts, judging from how you played your last games on the ladder and who are your next opponents, I predict you won't sustain that ranking for long.

Accuse players of cheating only because have betters win rate.....that is childish....aniway i have write " im not ranked yet " with a rating of 2012.....but he also is not ranked yet.....

this is tha tournament...http://WarLight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?TournamentID=2495

He's not ranked because he is no longer active, not due to small sample size.

You've done well thus far but you have yet to face any top competition and that will drop your rating. Hell, I faced and beat superior competition in my brief stint and I'm not much above average.

As for the cheating accusation, I won't make that claim but I will say that win rate is highly dubious. Even the top players out there will be lucky to maintain much higher than 80%.

top players play only medium earth strategic......i think its impossible have 98 % win ratio on this template......