I think giving people UNIVERSAL rights is a crooked concept. A state and/or society must agree to protect said rights, and states and societies clash with one another. A separate population will inevitable seek to usurp my own population. To extend basic rights to a different population is utterly futile.

I think people should only be given as many natural rights as is required to fulfill their life task. Absolute freedom, especially for the masses of lower talent (IQ) is a destructive and degenerative policy. The masses cannot be tasked with creating something meaningful for themselves and preserving their own history.

Welcome to the dark enlightenment

Tabby, I really can't believe that you're an individualist after all the things you've said on this forum.

>Claiming that ''we wuz kangs'' would have developed without colonization



topkek

The main reason why reproduction should not be a right at all is that free reproduction harms societies. IQ is inversely correlated with fertility and hence uncontrolled reproduction inevitably leads to degeneration of a population.

How comes it that reproduction has done an excellent job so far? From the beginning of huminity until now scientific knowledge has exploded and continues to advance at a rate never to be seen before.
Reproduction is not the problem. It's a natural concept that has worked perfectly for billions of years. Even for humans. The problem is not reproduction, but radical ideas like you. Thinking that the problem is only solveable in one way and only at the benefit of a very small part of the population.

I think giving people UNIVERSAL rights is a crooked concept. A state and/or society must agree to protect said rights, and states and societies clash with one another. A separate population will inevitable seek to usurp my own population. To extend basic rights to a different population is utterly futile.

I think people should only be given as many natural rights as is required to fulfill their life task. Absolute freedom, especially for the masses of lower talent (IQ) is a destructive and degenerative policy. The masses cannot be tasked with creating something meaningful for themselves and preserving their own history.

So you disagree with personal freedom? The freedom of equal opportunity. The freedom to make the best out of your life.
As far as I understand, your idea divides people into groups that are treated differently. All based on birth. Do you agree that people's fate should be determined solely by birth? That they have no right to change? Funny considering you come from a country that praises it's so called freedom so high. I think you dont worthship what you have. What people fought for for thousands of years and you want to throw away all that.
Those are backward views. Views applied in feudal Europe and still today in many parts of the world. Those parts also happen to be the least developed ones. Segregation solves nothing, but only creates tensions, violence and hinders progress.

Edited 7/21/2017 14:10:36

''So you disagree with personal freedom? The freedom of equal opportunity. The freedom to make the best out of your life.''

Like saying you disagree with god, either you believe in it or you don't. Facts and evidence don't come into play at all in this.


''As far as I understand, your idea divides people into groups that are treated differently. All based on birth. Do you agree that people's fate should be determined solely by birth?''

well strawmanned

''What people fought for for thousands of years and you want to throw away all that.''

100 years*

''Those are backward views.''

let the salt flow through you

''Views applied in feudal Europe and still today in many parts of the world. Those parts also happen to be the least developed ones. Segregation solves nothing, but only creates tensions, violence and hinders progress. ''

MUH PRAHGRESS

Oh tabby you are on of the greatest lesbians out there lmao

Hey Tabby. I have heard that you left this forums. So why are you still posting on it?

who the fuck is this red flag idiot man i really dont like him man so cringy foooohhhh

And why is he so salty people were kings hhhhhh 3ar9

The main reason why reproduction should not be a right at all is that free reproduction harms societies. IQ is inversely correlated with fertility and hence uncontrolled reproduction inevitably leads to degeneration of a population.

Who are we to seize control over people's organs? hehe
I agree that, since humans had created civilizations, they had totally isolated themselves from the kind of environment where genes were sculpted by one's natural surroundings.

Now, thousands of years down the line, we see the culmination of how far we have strayed from the metaphorical path. When humans are given the opportunity to do whatever they want. . . well. History has a lot to say about it. Once we had finally been let off the training wheels, we pedalled into the bonfire with exhilarated squeals.

Anyway, we have to put this kind of thing into perspective.
Yes:

*The rise in population of our race in recent years has put the planet in a perilous condition.

*This is the fault of our societies and cultures, which have evolved from indirect traits of evolutionary 'survival tactics' if you will.

*Natural Selection's influence on our race has been limited. We have endeavoured, since then, to keep up the good work of keeping the population down. ha. More like twisting the process to the ways of indulgence, greed, and egoism.

*The people of lower levels of consciousness (or 'dumb'. one shouldn't really categorise like this, but it makes things easier lol) are going to outnumber the higher fucks. People who grow up to poorly-educated parents, (there are a damn lot) are unlucky. Birth is a lottery, which most people lose.

*It is nobody's fault except the people who sit at the top, counting their money and looking down, spitting on the crowd below. We really should know better. We have the capacity.

*It always swings back to education. Education, education, education.

*Those who are less fortunate in the circumstance lottery will be brought up in ignorance that instils ignorance; more than just the token from the culture.

*Those who have higher IQs are more likely to put careful thought into the notion of having a child. This inevitably leads to a lower average birth rate. Whereas people who do not have access to the knowledge, or the tools to do so, will be having children without a thought for things like some of the farther impacts that such an action would cause, etc.

*One might think that the population problems are the fault of all those Asians who just won't stop having kids. This is not the case. For every 1 child born in the US, that is the equivalent of a Bangladeshi woman having ~600-1000 children. This is in terms of usage - energy and natural resources.

[{these are old facts, I haven't checked the latest, but I don't think that the figure would have fallen, since.}]

*'Free reproduction' is indeed harming societies, but the reproduction itself is not at fault. It is merely moving things along. Is is us who are out of whack. Our cultures, our societies. We have come from humble beginnings. We are learning, slowly. It may have been too slow. What if mine if the last generation to live out a lifetime, before the earth heats and we, warm-blooded creatures that we are, will be in dire straights. Was this truly the best we could do?

Something to thing about, neh?

Now, thousands of years down the line, we see the culmination of how far we have strayed from the metaphorical path. When humans are given the opportunity to do whatever they want. . . well. History has a lot to say about it. Once we had finally been let off the training wheels, we pedalled into the bonfire with exhilarated squeals.

You've never read a real history book in your life you braindead Marxist. Except maybe a public school book full of m-muh slavery M-MUH WIMMINZ OPRESHUNZ! guilt tripping.

Edited 7/22/2017 02:32:18

When someone says 'm-muh' to insult another, like how Castle does, it seems like he's just making himself look like a baby who shit himself.