<< Back to Clans Forum   Search

Posts 71 - 90 of 138   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next >>   
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/20/2017 05:39:13


Deadman 
Level 64
Report
Actually I see above that its 3v3 Deadman's Rome? I'm on that 3v3 team and guarantee you that we didnt miss a join.

Please advise.
I looked into this, and we have a bug in the CLOT. A loss was awarded to ACME incorrectly. It should have been awarded to Olympus instead.

The game was created on 03/15/2017 - 10:51:56. Aura's update was on 3/17/2017 16:14:25, and the game was already deleted. Game deletion was not due to a non-join, as that doesn't kick in until 3 days have elapsed since game creation.

We have a player(https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=3953087568) on the Olympus team who has not unlocked all the features on 3v3 Deadman's Rome. The minimum level for this template is 45, and the player is still 39. The player was actually brought in as a substitute on 2/10/2017 17:22:25.

Since game creation failed, the CLOT deletes the game and assigns the loser based on the player unable to join this game. There was a bug in this logic, which has now been fixed. I have also given the win to ACME instead. Sorry about that.

Edited 3/20/2017 08:37:24
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/20/2017 09:14:17


Kaerox
Level 59
Report
That's some awesome and fast issue-dealing, gratz for your work !
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/20/2017 12:20:08


Rento 
Level 61
Report
Olympus vs FBG is the same story, isn't it?
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/20/2017 13:02:34


JT 
Level 61
Report
Thank you!
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/20/2017 13:37:20


Aura Guardian 
Level 62
Report
When I get an opportunity, I will correct the scores as well.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/20/2017 15:29:43


Deadman 
Level 64
Report
Olympus vs FBG is the same story, isn't it?
Yes. Thanks for pointing it out. Fixed this too.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/21/2017 03:02:16


Aura Guardian 
Level 62
Report
Corrected Horse Race:



Corrected Data Summary:



This makes Olympus more dire... three points, total, in CL9. Words cannot even describe...

Edited 3/21/2017 03:03:06
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/21/2017 08:32:57


Kaerox
Level 59
Report
#PrayForOlympus
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/21/2017 09:20:58


Min34 
Level 63
Report
Poor Olympus. 1-23 is a very notable score, but not for the right reasons :(.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/21/2017 16:05:14


Great Expanse 
Level 60
Report
So I guess I'll kind of rip the Band-Aid off here.

So, up until now anyone that wanted to participate in Clan League could participate in Clan League. Even if it brought nothing to the competition and was kind of a waste of time for everyone. I mean, shouldn't there be a minimum bar for competing? Olympus this season is on the same level of Darklords in CL7. It is near impossible to police clans when they sign up for clan league, but maybe if clans aren't taking this seriously shouldn't be allowed to return until they do take it seriously. And a cooling off period might be a good idea. Because I don't know how Olympus participating is benefiting anyone.

At this point, Olympus has put an inactive player in their lineup at the beginning of the season, then replaced them with a player that did not meet the minimum level requirements of the template. If you don't read the rules, which aren't hard to, then its hard to see why Olympus should play next season.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/21/2017 16:15:48


Min34 
Level 63
Report
In my opinion, a clan that gets booted a lot and screws up with their lineups and such can be forced to either take it more serious or be thrown out for the next season. However, a clan not being able to keep up with the others from a strategic point of view should not be punished for that imo.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/21/2017 23:46:11


Benoît
Level 63
Report
We should give Olympus props, they won 1 game more than expected. Just kidding ;). In all seriousness though, I agree that a clan should be somewhat serious going to Clan League.

Edited 3/21/2017 23:49:07
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/22/2017 00:47:00


Aura Guardian 
Level 62
Report
-my bad-

Edited 3/22/2017 00:52:19
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/22/2017 10:50:54


SuperGamerz
Level 59
Report


FCC should be the winners of Guiroma 2v2 since we have the head to head vs. Hydra right?
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/22/2017 11:44:53

Hunta 
Level 63
Report
ACME will probably end 4-1 aswell in Guiroma 2v2 so no :P
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/22/2017 19:45:16


indibob
Level 61
Report
regarding Olympus, i don't see what the problem is.

The format of this new CL rather encourages strategic line-ups.
I would imagine that Olympus looked at the format and decided to totally punt this first round, giving them a much better chance of performing well in the D division.

I'm sure there are teams that have used their best players in an effort to qualify to division C.
You may well find that Olympus will perform much better in the next stage whilst one or two others will struggle.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/22/2017 20:00:40


Benoît
Level 63
Report
I doubt they will do much better in division D, but I understand your reasoning. Some clans will be relatively weaker going to division C, but some will arguably be better going in the upper division. Some clans clearly wanted to make sure they get to division C, while other seemed to be holding back. It will be interesting to see what strategy will pay off the most in the end.
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/22/2017 21:16:06


Electric_Kitten
Level 58
Report
Congrats(???) to Olympus for being the first to finish all their Q games, ending in a grand total of 3 points from their one win on strat ME vs Poon. Crazy stuff.

On the topic of seriousness going into Clan League, what if there was some sort of minimum points required in able to be eligible to apply back to the next CL? Like if a team doesn't manage say, 15 points overall, they can't re-apply. This still gives the (potentially) underachieving team a chance in the D round of CL to gain those points back. For example, on the gameplay side of things (not commenting on the non-rule reading) clans like FBG or German Warlords could have been in a similar spot as Olympus, had they been dropped into a group as tough as Q3.

I don't exactly have high hopes for them, but their odds will, in theory, be higher to win more games in D2.

Edited 3/22/2017 21:24:27
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/24/2017 04:22:24


Aura Guardian 
Level 62
Report
Q1 has hit a turning point, with all games either created or completed at this point. I guess I roll the credits here :P

Shoutout to MotD and Beren for taking the time and effort to put this all together and create the clot. I thank you greatly for the hard work that you put into this, especially to make my job, and that of all scorekeepers, easy.

Thank You to ACME for correcting the mistakes. Otherwise it would not be so close.

Thanks to all of those who commented on this thread. Much obliged to keep it active around here.

Thanks to all other scorekeepers, for correcting me when I was wrong.

Thanks to everyone who participated in clan league to help make it the success that it is.

Finally, one heart-felt thanks to BADA, who is going on a period of long inactivity at the very least. You will be missed in the FCC, and you brought a dynamic to our team in 2v2 guiroma that I am very thankful for. To be honest, I would have had no idea what I would have done for the roster had you not volunteered to play for us.

Good luck all in the remaining games!

May the aura forever guide you.

-[FCC] Aura Guardian

Edited 3/24/2017 04:23:33
Clan League 9: Division Q1 Official Thread: 3/24/2017 15:34:51


Great Expanse 
Level 60
Report
Roll credits? The question of who promotes isn't settled....
Posts 71 - 90 of 138   <<Prev   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next >>