Here is the link if you don't want to stay for the commentary: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-billy-bush-rape-culture_us_57f80a89e4b0e655eab4336c?

Today, a video and audio was released of Trump being caught on a hot mic back in 2005. In it Trump detailed all the things he would do to this women who he saw and tried to pick up (mind you they were both married) in lockeroom-esque banter with Bill Bush. This man is out of his mind if he thinks he can win the white house. He needs to drop out and stop shaming the republican party (even though they deserve every bit of it).

P.S. This is New York values.

We had presidents who raped, had slaves and warmongered. Politicians are typically sleazy folk with no honor, Trump fits the mold (he might be better than Clinton but he's still a sleaze).

Uh get your priorities strate, mate.

This is a man who wants to disband the Environment Protection Agency, get ready for the smog.

This is a man who wants to let other countries develop core weapons.

A man who wants to upscale the wars America is in.

A man who says that shielding Christians has priority over everyone else, couldn't you at least whine about this rather than some petty insults he did that are not letting good know to anyone at all?

And then there's the evil woman.

Furthermore, what you named this thread is very very misleading. He did not "sexually assault" (call it what it is, crimefuck, rape) anyone.

He needs to drop out and stop shaming the republican party (even though they deserve every bit of it).

He's everything that the Republican party stands for. He's what some call "tough".

Edited 10/8/2016 06:32:21

This is a man who wants to disband the Environment Protection Agency, get ready for the smog.

The environmental protection agency falsifies and uses loopholes to expand regulation, off with it.

This is a man who wants to let other countries develop core weapons.

We had a president who refused that; his name was George Bush.

And then there's the evil woman.

Who supported the invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan, the bombing of Serbia, the bombing of Libya, and the support of terrorists in Syria. And wants to invade Russia. Yes, evil describes her perfectly.

environmental protection agency falsifies and uses loopholes to expand regulation, off with it.

I rather too much environmental regulation than too little. And you can make an argument for both ways on bribing but who has more money, benzene-cars or Sun-cars?

We had a president who refused that; his name was George Bush.

are you really saying this? you're just wielding felinist log now.

"Bush had sex, Bush was bad -> sex is bad -> let's castrate"

Or when believers say that godlessness is bad since Hitler and Stalin were both godless.

And wants to invade Russia.

liberate*

but really, source.

Edited 10/8/2016 06:58:06

but back on-topic:

Trump beats Clinton personality-wise 49 ways to heaven. I hate Trump's policies (which are what matter), but he talks and feels way better than a hag bag of boring overstandable, and he's not afraid to say something offensive. He (feels that way, anyway) speaks his mind.

Edited 10/8/2016 07:01:25

Putin sucks

i agree Zhirinovski 1987 proud upholder he needs to win
then we can throw out the jews

Hail Lord Trump, who cares anyway what Trump says.

This thread is pure vulgar sexual assault.

Convenient that they released this news just as HRC's transcripts were released. I wonder what HRC's public and private opinion is on this issue.

are you really saying this? you're just wielding felinist log now.

You're right, but I'd rather have someone who'd not war over core weapons than someone who would.

but really, source.

https://amp.ibtimes.co.uk/clinton-us-should-use-military-response-fight-cyberattacks-russia-china-1579187

http://i.imgur.com/Q3IjhL2.gifv

Ugh, Juq your ignorance on American history shines through once again. The original Republican Party was the most radical extremist hard left majority to ever sweep the north up until the New Deal ( I consider myself a Progressive Republican/Leftest Libertarian/Centrist Democrat )

Trump is just the extreme of the Nixon plan ( Nixon won a historic electoral victory by sweeping the complete south, something very few Republicans did up until then. Bad part was he basically made the party trade the rest if the country for it ). This is actually best seen. Up until Nixon, GOP nominees were ehh but from the 70s on everything went to bat shit ( I kinda liked Reagan. He basically took half of my view and blitzed up to extremist levels but besides that ) We had the Bush, Dole, and John McCain * holds back tears of anger *. The party needs desperate reform

Anyhow, your all nut jobs fur thinking Hillary or Donald would actually be good. Vote Johnson.....he will ban high school spelling tests

Actually, I'm more afraid of Hillary being more like Bush then Obama 2.0. I mean at least with Obama you knew he had a plan to break every single US amendment of the United States constitution and then set up his own private propaganda ministry. Bush wasn't that smart and anyone who actually believes Bush was part of a master plan to own the world is a moron


I mean really? Out of all the more acceptable, brain loving, mediocre people in politics George Soros thought that George Bush, A man who comes from a family where the smart one is called " Jeb " would be a perfect mastermind choice? I mean every puppet is dumb but that dumb is where our tax dollars go for welfare.

Edited 10/9/2016 06:23:07

A progressive complaining about presidents breaking amendments, how novel.

#GrabEmByThePussy

Vote Johnson.....he will ban high school spelling tests

Ouch. Someone's quite bitter. Looks like ol' Conservative's illiteracy has finally caught up with him at school.

This stupid farce of an US election is taking so much time and energy...

What a waste, do something useful, Murica!!!

Nixon won a historic electoral victory by sweeping the complete south, something very few Republicans did up until then. Bad part was he basically made the party trade the rest if the country for it

I assume you're not talking about his reelection where he literally won 49/50 states, in which he did indeed "sweep the entire south", although he also "swept the entire north" and "swept the entire west". Rather, I'd assume you're talking about his first election. Here is the map from that election:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/41/ElectoralCollege1968.svg

The list of states that nixon lost is actually pretty impressive for someone who "swept the complete south":

1. Texas
2. Arkansas
3. Alabama
4. Mississippi
5. Georgia
6. Louisiana

This means that the only meaningful victories he achieved in the south were virginia, tennessee, Florida, and North carolina, none of which had been particularly solid parts of the "solid south" before this (see elections like 1956, 1952, and 1928), and even remain somewhat swingy today (see elections like 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, and 2012).

The original Republican Party was the most radical extremist hard left majority to ever sweep the north up until the New Deal

The Republican party has never been Liberals in the sense that they you know, actually want to legalize more stuff. The republican party has always been focused on banning stuff, it's just that it's different stuff 150 years later.

Vote Johnson.....he will ban high school spelling tests

No offense honestly, but johnson pretty much smokes way too much weed to be any kind of effective president...

Edited 10/9/2016 10:50:54