<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 4 of 4   
Win records for large FFA games: 10/20/2011 17:27:46

The Duke of Ben 
Level 55
Report
I've been trying to get into larger FFA games lately, and I've noticed something when trying to determine how good a particular player is. If someone has played a lot of FFA games, they are likely to have a listing for just about every number of players.

16 player FFA 0/6
17 player FFA 1/5
18 player FFA 1/17

And so on. To me, those are functionally the same, since there is almost no difference between a 16 player game and a 17 player game.

My suggestion would be to put like groupings together, like 20-24 player games being the same category. This would make looking at someone's profile much easier, and make the information we are actually looking for (how experienced/good in this player at X game type) more accessible.
Win records for large FFA games: 10/20/2011 18:28:11

bman7
Level 37
Report
There actually is a bit of a difference between them, since it's 1 more player to eliminate. Maybe the records could be sorted like you said, but have one of those expandable things to see the details of the individual game types.
Win records for large FFA games: 10/20/2011 18:49:31


Warbeard 
Level 47
Report
My friend 'Luke' is 2/3 in 24FFA. Beat that!
Win records for large FFA games: 10/20/2011 18:51:34

The Duke of Ben 
Level 55
Report
An expandable section would be fine for me. It's just awkward to try and count up all the wins/games played for each category when there is usually a very small number of wins in each category.
Posts 1 - 4 of 4