Doesn't mean it's more fun. Maybe in competitive play, but I don't really care about that and a controller feels rather good in my hands.

I find it more fun to be quick and accurate in a competitive shooter. I am able to preform better and have more fun at the game teamkilling. That being said, I do play games primarily on PlayStation, and will play non competitive shooters like bioshock or Wolfenstein with a controller there.

More accuracy = easier = less fun

Less accuracy = harder = more fun

That logic doesn't make much sense lol

More accuracy means it's easier to aim. The skill level is raised because of it. Pc players are of a higher skill because they are playing with better players, then people that miss most their shots because of a controller.

no having good accuracy makes it fun. The fun comes from killing the opponent not fighting the aiming mechanics of the game to be able to hit someone.

xd
*roasted*
kek
LOL !!

You should make a rap with each word ending in an word beginning with ex-. Like this:

Don't cross paths with me,
I'll violently exacerbate,
I will bring a faith debate,
You'll end up exorciated,
Blood, I donated,
To get a premium membership at Islamqa.

Edited 9/16/2016 23:48:48

i hear they hand out membership cards with pics of some bearded guy name mohammad

Edited 9/17/2016 02:00:25

The lack of Bloodborne and Witcher III is very disappointing.

Also; Divinity: Original Sin.

Edited 9/17/2016 17:05:18

Ultimate ninja storm 4 is real fun.

The inclusion of Failout 4, post-apocalyptic walking simulator 2015 made me sad

Fallout 4 was not at all a bad game. It wasn't a superb game, Witcher III was a far superior game, in the same genre. But Fallout 4 is not a bad game. I think it's roughly on par with Fallout 3. I consider both to pale in comparison to New Vegas however, and for New Vegas to be relatively equal in terms of quality to Fallout/Fallout 2, just "different". New Vegas at least holds true to the aesthetics of the earlier games, it's just mechanically different, but it's still far more a "real" Fallout game than 3 or 4 are in my eyes. 3 and 4 are still good games, I'm just not sure I'd call them good "Fallout Games".

As a Bethesda softwares game, I expected more to their genre. Skyrim improved heavily on the AI scripting and made characters that felt believable, if not unpredictable. Fallout 4 didn't really add anything to further their style of games. Sure there was the settlements, which I actually liked, but that sometimes felt like a chore. Being able to actually use the junk littered around is nice, but devalues them in terms of world building. Instead of sifting through junk to uncover secrets in that area, I was a vacuum taking everything I could see.


Maybe I'm just bored of their style now (I did platinum Skyrim on ps3). There's also some world design aspects of fallout games that I think hinder them, but that's neither here nor there.