let discuss

The Southern aristocracy was extremely delusional.

The North's industrialism was the modern way to go. The South depended far too much on Northern manufacturing. The South also didn't have the same amount of people as the North.

Not to mention a lot of Southerners were poor, so poor they didn't have slaves.

time to go Catatistic again

Uh, do you mean the European Band confederacy? Or the Swiss confederacy? Or the dead (North) German confederacy? Please be clearer.

Edited 8/11/2016 22:55:11

^ try looking up "confederacy"

The first result will blow your mind

^Well I looked it up and the first result on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confederacy is

Confederate tribes, during the Islamic Prophet Muhammad's era in the Battle of the Trench

So is that it?

Or if you actually looked it up on google you'd see the CSA.

And the non-unique naming of the country is irrelevant here, as the thread was established in response to a thread defending it, which was established in response to the thread I made, discussing the conflict this country took center stage in.

the brits ultimately didnt do the deal with confedreates cus they found another source of cotton

i think it was india or something

Edited 8/13/2016 04:26:30

It was both Egypt and India.

Also, a fourth of all British food imports were the US, so they couldn't really risk starvation over cotton. And the majority of the population was pro-US too.