It isn't the same. Also they didn't rule the nations by themselves.

In this fucking case then USA is a constitutional monarchy too! WTF is that logic !?

Edited 6/23/2016 03:36:37

No, it isn't. That's what an aristocracy is for. I'm going to stop arguing right now because you are just really unlearned. I suggest Liberty or Equality as a way to become redpilled.

I didnt say its the same. Read what I wrote carefully. I said the result and the amount of power given to the ruler is the same.

IT ISN'T YOU FUCKING KNOB!!!!

"OMG guys Monarchy is the perfect system. Just hand over your freedom already"

We abandoned monarchy for a reason.

the results are very different.

monarchies usually facilitate more civil liberties.

I am all for a constitutional monarchy with a good leader and capable elected council.

You know why most monarchs were overthrown violently or slowly phased into uselessness?

They fail in the long run, and only benefit an elite minority.

I am all for a constitutional monarchy with a good leader and capable elected council.

Who grants you that there will be a good leader and capable council?
Thats the problem with a monarchy.
NO ONE.

Lots of republics also did get overthrown. So?

Lots of republics also did get overthrown. So?

Example?

Monarchs are trained from goddamn birth and elected people must be educated to get elected in the first place. Voila!

''cough'' most known and obvious ''cough'' rome ''cough''

''You know why most monarchs were overthrown violently or slowly phased into uselessness?

They fail in the long run, and only benefit an elite minority. ''

citation needed. Also funny considering both the Russian and French revolutions were composed primarily of a small elite class of well educated people and not the peasantry.

''''Lots of republics also did get overthrown. So?''''

Indeed and they have had much shorter lifespans than kingdoms.

''You know why most monarchs were overthrown violently or slowly phased into uselessness?

They fail in the long run, and only benefit an elite minority. ''

citation needed. Also funny considering both the Russian and French revolutions were composed primarily of a small elite class of well educated people and not the peasantry.

There is no citiation needed. Look it up yourself.

There is a citation needed. You need to show how republics have been better for the average person as opposed to a monarchy.

Then you go look up the republics that got overthrown

also search ''yahya jammeh'' you end up with those kind of ''people'' when your state is ruled by a republic.

Homosexuals are not welcome in the Gambia.

Homosexuality is anti-humanity.

I don't believe in killing people. I believe in locking you up for the rest of your life.

I will develop the areas that vote for me, but if you don't vote for me, don't expect anything.

WTF

Edited 6/23/2016 03:54:53

"OMG guys Monarchy is the perfect system. Just hand over your freedom already"

We abandoned monarchy for a reason.

Not only do democratic governments take away freedoms (Jim Crow, NSA, Big Gulp, etc), democracies tend to force people to gravitate towards the norm, reducing freedom of expression and thought. Read Liberty or Equality for more.

You know why most monarchs were overthrown violently or slowly phased into uselessness?

They fail in the long run, and only benefit an elite minority.

Are you saying our republic doesn't do the same? The difference here is, the democratic people have been softened and can't do shit.

monarchies usually facilitate more civil liberties.

Yep. For more on this phenomenon, read Liberty or Equality. You won't, because it goes against your worldview, but whatever.

I am all for a constitutional monarchy with a good leader and capable elected council.

Not elected. Just nobles.

Example?

R u fucking retarded?