I love it that billy is so oldschool that he thinks anyone is impressed by stats.

Yes, you're right, it's much better to be impressed by the hating ability people display on the forums. Yours is top notch. I'm very impressed.

Sometimes I delay and attack an enemy's stack with 2s last order knowing that he would move the stack to hit another territory. It's a good tactic if you are good at predicting.

I'm not seeing this game with LAWLZ that everyone is referencing... Could someone link the profile? And are we pretty for sure that this is not the same Lawlz as before?

Norman thinks it's cool to call CORP - LAWLZ. I know, it's unclear, unnecessary and nonsensical, but that's what he does for some reason.

dank memes m8 i r8 kek/8

This made me laugh.

Billy is my favorite warlight user and im pretty sure everyone loves him too. I think he should be announced as warlight king.

careful, haters will say you are my alt

Billy walsh,
1. the incomes given, 5-20 and 13-36 are the incomes you could easily of deduced through the fog, with what you had shown to have known at that point of the game.
as I stated, you could of easily deduced he had at least a 16 income, since he dropped 21 on your border the previous turn, and he captured a 4 turn bonus on that turn, giving him 20 income, while you had 5.
you had 13 armies, you could see 17 armies, you knew he had mexico due to your counter attacks, as well as the rest of E.asia and scandinavia, which would of brought the total armies up to 13-36.
those are the calculations a good player would of deduced via fog.. calculations that would of put it below the 0.000000001% you stated, since you stated how you believe under 50% income ratio and armies should be counted as a loss until otherwise stated.
5-20 is a 25% income ratio
13-36 is a 36% army ratio
It is however possible that in 2 days of thinking you didn't do these 5 minute calculations, and I would accept that you thought you still had a chance and were unaware of the situation, however that would require you to relinquish *greatest player on warlight* tag, since even mediocre players would have figured out the score.


he was too hasty to imply you were stalling, only 11 hours into the turn of your imminent defeat, and I would be willing to give you credit, had your immediate response to *please surrender I'm obviously going to win* wasn't *calm the fuck down* followed by as I've logically shown, is a false statement.

calculations that would of put it below the 0.000000001% you stated

Wrong. You probably surrender too early like almost everybody. And you're assuming he and I have equal skill when in actuality I'm far better. He also has a big weakness that hurts him in these spots. You add all of those together and I absolutely had a chance to win.

even mediocre players would have figured out the score

You just said I'm worse than a mediocre player, and you expect to have any credibility? You're a hater in different clothing. I did not give a fuck about the score. That's different than having an inability to calculate it. There were 2 minutes to go in the game and I knew I was down by a lot and would need several quick touchdowns and onside kick recoveries and you're telling me even a mediocre player would know they were down by 20 and not 17. I did not give a fuck about the scoreboard at that point. I would argue only a mediocre player like you would be focused on it, instead of the next touchdown.

Congrats to your 2026 rating btw, Billy. You have honestly beaten every Miezekatze Hunter player so far on your way to the top :(

Thanks.