1. Islam is not good for any nation; they were brought here without consent from the people; they could be ISIS, ISIS-supporting or just extremist. America first.
Isn't it ironic, though, that murderous Christian extremists were brought, or rather, invaded America, and killed most all Americans, and pretended they were Americans? It's very ironic you say this. I definitely don't like some Islamic policies, just as I don't Christian ones. Christians, though, have since betrayed their Book, and became more irreligous, making them generally safer, though the Christian literalists, well, they're still killing folk. Muslims, though, as a whole, have betrayed their Reading much less, and are much more literalist. Egypt has one of the most devout Muslim populations, more than half the country wants Islamic theologic law for everyone, not just Muslims. But they obey their book, and in their book, there shall be no compulsion in faith, and as a result, most Islamic countries have a low murder rate, relative to their living standards, and I don't think there's any Islamic country not at war that has a higher murder rate than America, which is much more developed and Christian.
And if you want to get into the past of it, modern science developed in the Islamic world, and the Islamic world was one of the laxest faiths in the world until 1258.
Now, those Mashriqar, they've been called by all the Islamic scholars and theologians as not Muslim, so maybe if they were, this problem would not be there in the first bit, eh?
Taken out of context
That's what Trump supporters always say. Here's a quote taken out of context: "women...don't have a country". Anyhow, he said that Mexico is sending evil folk to America, and he even later said that he wasn't talking just about immigration. "I said "Mexico is sending"— I'm not knocking immigration or immigrants". That's like saying that generally, if you go into an Albanian neighbourhood, you're going to get killed, when actually Albanian neighbourhoods have lower murder rates than average.
Criticism of an organization supportive of criminals and criminal actions isn't racist. They manufacture issues.
I don't think Trump is bad for criticising BLM, but for pretty much refusing to condemn or criticise KKK, while doing this? Hmm.
The highest form of patriotism is dissent.
On the bombing families - total war is the only way to win. Everyone who has ever taken off a band-aid know quick and hard is better than slow and long.
So are you willing to sacrifice you, your family, and your friends for supporting a far more dangerous organisation, if America reached its end?
Even if America was trying to do the right thing in the Middle East (it definitely wasn't), even with torture and land troops, and all that fun, they totally failed in their "goal". Get out, it's better for everybody - no grounds to attack America (it's not fighting the thugs anymore), less spending for America, and less bloodshed.
What's so bad about protecting American jobs from outsourcing? What's bad about preventing foreign corporations from destroying U.S companies?
Why should Americans be fat and lazy and be given everything on a plate, and compete only with their own weak selves? American jobs are not stolen, Americans can still get them (well, with minimal wage, maybe not, but still), and foreigners are not in any way favoured to get these jobs, actually, probably less favoured for some jobs, since they are less qualified. And foreign businesses do not "wreck" American businesses, American businesses fail themselves out of their own incompetence (and disproportionately high taxes on them).
