<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 21 - 33 of 33   <<Prev   1  2  
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/22/2016 17:49:10


TeamGuns
Level 59
Report
Krzychu took davidian side, the conversation is over.
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/22/2016 18:44:19

talia_fr0st
Level 59
Report
1. I'd like to point out that not one of the many well-used templates out there are for FFAs, if there was such a thing there'd be a ladder for it ('cause that's how everything works round here).

2. There was a 40 player FFA on edgeless square recently, nobody gave a speck of shit about people making alliances.

3. I thought you were going to make reference to the uservoice for peace treaty cards.
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/26/2016 17:10:23


Pooncrew 
Level 62
Report
We won
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/26/2016 21:48:32

Mike
Level 59
Report
Can we have the link of the game ?

Anyway why was vote not offered (and accepted) if boots happenned at turn 0 ? Or wasnt it at turn 0 ?

And alliances should not be allowed and regarded as cheats in FFA (or team games of more than 2 teams) unless clearly specified in the description. Otherwise it is just as unfair as a player having a secret alt in the FFA game. But thats just my 2c ;).
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/26/2016 22:01:14


Pooncrew 
Level 62
Report
Agreed Mike
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/27/2016 00:36:03

QueefBalls 
Level 61
Report
In this case it was a special edition game created to celebrate Patriot's Day so it wouldn't be right to end by vote. But even if it was a normal game I don't think vote to end is a good idea just cause someone got booted. It's not fair to the players that want to play and who take their turns in time
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/27/2016 12:35:50


Pooncrew 
Level 62
Report
Plus its a 39 player team FFA, there is no way you are gonna get that many people to vote
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/27/2016 16:32:16

Mike
Level 59
Report
Are you sure because in the OP he says his teammates got booted. In a 39 FFA for sure vote makes no sense.
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/27/2016 19:21:54


Pooncrew 
Level 62
Report
Sure about what mike? The game was 13 teams of 3. His two teammates got booted pretty early i believe.
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/28/2016 15:47:10


Pooncrew 
Level 62
Report
Well in true bozo fashion I challenged Davidian to a 3 vs 3. With Queefballs, Jamrod, and I vs. Davidian and two open seats (pre reqs on for people above level 13 and boot% below 20) with 3 day boots because he said we can't win a game without booting. Davidian declined so he is a wuss. The End. We Win. BOOM
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/28/2016 16:35:02


Medium Rare
Level 28
Report
I'm a noob here, but I've been playing turn-based, Risk-like games for 28 years. I would point out the 'default' setting on the vast majority of these games is 'anything goes.' War is Machiavellian with many shifting alliances. Warlight is a war game.
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/28/2016 16:42:54


Doivid
Level 57
Report
Lol still namecalling even on the forum.

You guys are cheats and liars and you have a reputation for that. I come here to have fun. Being taunted and namecalled is not fun, why the fuck would I play with you again?

Feel free to keep calling me misogynistic names tho, shows some real class there.

Edited 4/28/2016 17:18:29
Temp alliances/NAPs in team games: 4/28/2016 16:43:36


Doivid
Level 57
Report
jrandmiller, you'd think so, but these guys can't handle playstyles that they don't approve of, so they have to throw public temper tantrums, as above.
Posts 21 - 33 of 33   <<Prev   1  2