When I think of CORP's best, I think of Dr. Walter Ego, Thanatos D. Ven, mm3100 and yourself. Even with those, I hold my claim 101st (as a whole) reached an higher level than CORP at present time. However, there might newer and potentially better players than I'm not aware of. In that case, you'd be completely right.

I was under the impression that people quoting me would have been up to the challenge like Angry Koala. Never mind about that!

Long live free Scotland.

Edited 4/8/2016 18:56:43

who wants a friendly battle with Brotherrs in Arms?

I'm sure you can ask Plat who CORP's elite are as he has tried to recruit *steal many of them recently.

yourself

W-w-w-wh-what!?

Our best possible lineup will be revealed in Clan League, and your presumptions do make sense. Also, an all 1v1 competition imo won't be optimal if we want a proper competition against youse 101sts :)

A consent to co-operate and do what there told..

Given Plat's history and the # of missing details about the exact mechanics of the battle, this part is a bit sketch. It'd be nicer if Plat clarified a process for template selection, etc., so other clan leaders would feel more secure and be less likely to believe that Plat's going to manipulate the rules.

Our lineup will be pretty interesting this season ...lol ox we proved our points in a major way

I'm sure you can ask Plat who CORP's elite are as he has tried to recruit *steal many of them recently.

He's an irish, what you'd expect, even their potatoes and whisky are stolen.


I do think we have a better level then CORP, but we are still behind of Blitz (trying to be neutral and impartial here, so pls don't start attacking me).

For the challenge, I'd love to play CORP really. If you think you can beat us, maybe you can, you have good players and it's possible that we are wrong in or judgement. Would be an interesting thing to do anyways. Everyone gains from the challenge, both in skill and preparation for the CL.

Edited 4/8/2016 19:18:14

I also counter-propose this format: https://www.warlight.net/Forum/146116-clan-1v1-proposal

@Vitriol and ppls suggestions for templates

I think your clan battle proposition interesting, but it probably doesn't fits 101st goal, mostly for the teams part. We want to make a quick challenge, the problem on team games is that they can take a very long time, and we don't have that time to prepare for the CL.

As for template suggestions, I hardly think plat would try to manipulate them, he just proposed widely known templates, supposing he'd try to manipulate those is non-sense. Also, no one in 101st would accept that.

I do however support a few modifications on the template choosing. Instead of those 3 templates, we should take 1 template proposed by each clan leader (taken from the pool of templates that might be on the CL), and for the tie-break game, we go for the 1v1 ladder template.

Templates and other rules are up for negotiation and will be finalised before the competition goes officially ahead!

This was from my main post, Please don't make nonsense claims that I'm trying to manipulate the rules, These are just ridiculous assumptions without any thought. This quote rules out any claim of me manipulating the rules but people seem to ignore these parts and I have to repeat them.

I for one just really want this challenge to go ahead, when I first saw all the names if 101st talent I was leaning on there victory. However when I thought more about CORP I believe they are very much on a similar skill level with 101st than people believe. (CORP top players of which there are a good 10 which have gone 100 + on the ladder)

Edited 4/8/2016 19:37:48

Just make the mechanics for template selection clearer- you're more than welcome to just pull from the algorithm I described in the linked post. I'm not the only person on this site who doesn't trust you. There's at least two clans that would gladly face you if you clarified the mechanics and possibly added team games.

I mean, not to get too OT, but you know it too (a PM from that time I called you out last week):

You do realize I'm in the 101st chat, and ... they're blaming it on me. I stopped talking after Platinum said "Who ratted my out to knyte?" ...

"Who ratted my [sic] out?" isn't the kind of language you hear from someone who knows they did nothing wrong. :P

Also, if it ain't gonna happen officially, might as well just have a little tournament to see how things stack up: https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer/Tournament?ID=18441

Edited 4/8/2016 19:49:11

I have to say that the idea of playing a tournament is pretty bad knyte. We're gonna have 101st playing on 101st and CORP playing on CORP, there's little sense on doing a challenge on this format.

Obviously it has its shortcomings, but I'm not going to manually run a league ever again.

Knyte, If you are going to start bring "off-topic" stuff into this thread and start another drama thread just please get out of this thread, Discuss stuff about the title of the thread and stop with this absurd ridiculous "off-topic" stuff about me.

I will say this for the 3rd time for you, Maybe 3rd time lucky, If you a problem with me mail me in private dont be doing this calling me out on the forums,i just find it very annoying.

Nobody said about we doing a league out of this... The concept is very simple really:

- 3 1v1 templates. Winning 2 games is required to give a point to a clan.
- Players matched up with their closest skill-level opponents, #1 of clan A plays #1 of Clan B; #2 of clan A plays #2 of Clan B;...
- Players create their games.

It doesn't need to be any harder then this.


=======================================================

And yea, that's not only annoying but also a shameful thing. Supposing that plat would rig the games in our favour isn't only an insult to him, but to all of 101st. You've lost any respect I still had for you there.

Edited 4/8/2016 21:26:43

It's not my accusation that Plat would rig these games. I just know that multiple clan leaders that I'd personally like to see taking up this challenge have that concern due to the unclear mechanisms proposed by Platinum.

How come you've never annoyed me this bad back when you back in Optinum? Is this what you do with your free time now inexchange for leading Optinum?

With annoying posts

I mean, not to get too OT, but you know it too (a PM from that time I called you out last week):


You do realize I'm in the 101st chat, and ... they're blaming it on me. I stopped talking after Platinum said "Who ratted my out to knyte?" ...


"Who ratted my [sic] out?" isn't the kind of language you hear from someone who knows they did nothing wrong. :P

I am just going to ignore you from this point on.

You seem to be taking this a little bit personally.

All I'm saying is that:

- At least two people rejected your invite because they think that the specific rule I quoted makes things too sketch and gives you too much leeway to set the rules in a potentially manipulative way.

- I'd personally like to see these matches happen.

- Obviously, they weren't going to be honest about their concerns. So I spilled the beans because I don't think you're actually going to manipulate things and expected you to just issue some clearer mechanics so the challenges go through.

I don't get why you think I'm making personal accusations against you here. Sure, I don't trust you, but that's not my point- just make the mechanics clearer so you don't need that "do what they're told" provision and there's at least two people- that you actually want to challenge- that would be a hell of a lot more likely to actually take on this challenge.

Good luck.

Edited 4/8/2016 22:44:09

101st will be splitting into two teams in order to help accomodate clans with lower size who wants to play against us!

Two teams named 101st "A" and 101st "B"

A being higher rated players
B being lower rated players

101st A:

Tac(ky)tical
Panagiotis
Jinxed
Bonsai
Master Failure
TeamGuns
Platinum

101st B:
Red Army
Wojo
Njord
Forgotten Knight
TheRiverStyxie
Doron Hoh
Hercules



101st A team is planned to be playing against M'Hunters!
101st B team is still waiting for an opponent!

Edited 4/8/2016 22:54:35