Also Palestinian Arabs are Semetic themselves.

I said provide proof for your idea that the entire Palestinian ethnic group is anti-Jew.

Although being semitic does not prove one not to be rascist nor anti-semitic.

You seem to be ignorant, huh?-Just read all of my comments and
refer to it in the same manner of behaviour.
Until now you´re just being illogical and stubborn.

Edited 3/13/2016 06:25:44

We're dumb, lay it down easily for us, since we can barely read, just try to explain it as basically as you can, using short words, and concepts we can understand.

*How is Sanders legitimately communist?
*If Palestinians are anti-Semitic, do they hate themselves, since they themselves are Semitic?
*What general (not anecdotal/exemplary) proof do you have that the Palestinians as a nation are racist and prejudice to Jews, as a faith?
*What happens if a Palestinian Arab is Jewish?
*What terror organisation wants to kill 100% of Israel's population/want another shoah?
*When did Smedley support Mashriq?
*How is Smedley unpleasant?
*How is Smedley illogic?

Edited 3/13/2016 06:50:04

Yea, Жұқтыру, he's using the classic trump rethoric. Just say a bunch of assumptions about something, don't prove anything and if he's contradicted, just offend a person directly.

For him if you say anything close to positive about muslims/critic of the US actions in the middle east, you're automatically supporting ISIS. But no, he's not islamophobic because he has muslim friends... Just as if having a muslim friend made him impartial and right. What a funny moron.

Edited 3/13/2016 08:27:19

Just saw this, and didn't read any of the pages except this current one but...

For him if you say anything close to positive about muslims/critic of the US actions in the middle east, you're automatically supporting ISIS.

Right... and if Trump says anything close to increasing border security, you people immediately label him as a racist and a xenophobic.

See how it goes both ways? I call it liberal logic, in which freedom of speech only applies if you say what they want to hear.

Oh look, it even applies to the topic of this thread.

Edited 3/13/2016 11:27:58

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GepGO6HqL3o&feature=youtu.be

I'm sure some will label me a conspiracy theorist, but this stuff seems very organized. Bernie "protesters" at Trump rallies belong to prison. Bernie has capitalized on an issue-oriented campaign, but he says nothing against his own supporters threatening to rape and kill innocents.

Oh and by the way, the Trump attacker in Ohio has been featured in ISIS propaganda videos.

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/03/12/breaking-trump-ohio-attacker-tommy-dimassimo-connected-to-isis-suspect-featured-in-isis-propaganda-videos-2015/

Edited 3/13/2016 14:02:37

you are right, not only is it some moronic conspiracy theories, and Paul Joseph Watson has made a business to appeal to morons, basically every video he does is just full of bullshit lies and conspiracy theories. The guy is showing tweets of random people to make his points, this is pathetic. And when a video's title is "The Truth About..." you know this is gonna be a loads of horseshit appealing to people who love conspiracy theories and don't care about facts.

you are right, not only is it some moronic conspiracy theories, and Paul Joseph Watson has made a business to appeal to morons, basically every video he does is just full of bullshit lies and conspiracy theories.

Translation: he brings up inconvenient facts that you cannot refute, so you go straight after his person.

Are you saying that all the footage of maimed cops, blocking ambulances, and textual threats of violence were fabricated by him? Totally doesn't sound like a comspiracy theory.

Being a small politician will not prepare you for being the big politician.

If this were true then no president in the history of the US has ever been prepared to be president

Being a small politician will not prepare you for being the big politician.

If this were true then no president in the history of the US has ever been prepared to be president

False. You have 3 exceptions: Lyndon B. Johnson, George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush. All came from Texas. Everything is bigger in Texas. They're all 3 big politicians.

If this were true then no president in the history of the US has ever been prepared to be president

Yeah, that is true. The only thing that can prepare you for ruling a country is ruling a country.

See how it goes both ways? I call it liberal logic, in which freedom of speech only applies if you say what they want to hear.

Why do you call it liberal, if both sides do it? (Also, Sanders is not liberal - he is socialist).

Edited 3/13/2016 20:27:08

Translation: he brings up inconvenient facts that you cannot refute, so you go straight after his person.

Are you saying that all the footage of maimed cops, blocking ambulances, and textual threats of violence were fabricated by him? Totally doesn't sound like a comspiracy theory.
hes not saying the footage is conspiracy theory hes saying that hes using the footage to promote the conspiracy theory that these are bernie sanders supporters and that bernie paid and supported these people

Yeah, that is true. The only thing that can prepare you for ruling a country is ruling a country.

According to that logic we have to give Barack Obama infinity more years in office until his death because all the other candidates are "unprepared".

Edited 3/13/2016 20:28:02

This is a good thing about kingdoms. But America needs to grow weaker, not stronger, so go republic.

Isn't that too authoritarian? Also doesn't seem a good solution when your country is partially divided among different ideologies. In my opinion gouverments should be gouverned 50% by the parliament and 50% by the monarch in order to have an ideal political functional system.

^lol no. Ask the UK if they want Queen Elizabeth II to have 50% of the power.

Also doesn't seem a good solution when your country is partially divided among different ideologies. In my opinion gouverments should be gouverned 50% by the parliament and 50% by the monarch in order to have an ideal political functional system.

Ideally, yes, this is good. But parliament will corrupt, too, and have the same problems as most republics today. Making it like that lowers the problems by 50%, but not by 100%.

Right... and if Trump says anything close to increasing border security, you people immediately label him as a racist and a xenophobic.

It's not racist to increase border security. What's racist and xenophobic is to say mexicans that come to our country are all rapist, thieves and drug dealers, but some I assume, are good people. That's a xenophobic sentence no? Change mexicans by jews and you've found yourself a new hitler.

Btw, Idk why Sanders should apologize, he hasn't asked his supporters to attack trump. Not like trump who says "beat the crap out of them, I'll pay for any sue", or says "there was blood comming out of her, whatever", and that's over and over, and he never apologizes when he's wrong and spread lies. So ye know, don't be a hippocrite.

Btw, Idk why Sanders should apologize, he hasn't asked his supporters to attack trump.

Well, even if he has, he's not going to say he did unless there's widespread undeniable proof.