again no evidence to back your claims.

Do you deny that folk like more folk that are like them, personality and physicality? There's been many many studies done on this, it's pretty much conclusively accepted in psychology field.

Edited 3/2/2016 03:50:26

Theres no evidence that this influences hiring practices.

I know gay/lesbian people and they are like wtf is this. Some say things like "LGBTQIADC" like really, there's only 17 letters left, chill out.

stop being silly, you're either boy or girl.

This isn't arbitrary at all. That's a well defined binary actually. Also. The term homophobe, which is inaccurate to start with, doesn't even apply in this case. I think the common social justice term is "Transphobe".

In America, the white-skinned are the wealthiest class. It is a privilege to be wealthy. What more explaining do you need?

Not all whites are wealthy, and it's silly to assume a person is privileged merely because they are white. The social justice warriors in question are always the first to shout racism, yet ironically they seem to forget that judging people based on their skin color is one of the most common definitions of racism....

Also, what even is SJW?

A very infuriating group of radical leftists who take liberal tenets to such extremes they cease being liberal anymore. According to SJWs anyone who's a white,straight,male is evil, and minorities are incapable of doing anything wrong. If you say anything that is "offensive", you are an evil person who will be attacked by the SJW mob.

Social Justice Warriors claim to stand for rights and liberty, but they are one of the single biggest threats to freedom in developed countries. Stepping on freedom of speech under the guise of protecting minority interests.

^For example, SJWs on the campus of Princeton have asked that a building named after Woodrow Wilson be removed and given a new name because he was a Democrat who favored segregation.

They've also made similar proposals to rewrite or erase historical figures from campuses, such as Thomas Jefferson or George Washington.

Edited 3/2/2016 04:14:39

Thomas Jefferson isnt actually a bad idea.

We need more Alexander Hamilton!

Alexander Hamilton was a whore for the rich.

Theres no evidence that this influences hiring practices.

Why on earth wouldn't it influence hiring practices? I mean this with low offence, but you sound like a bigot right now.

https://www.chicagobooth.edu/capideas/spring03/racialbias.html

This isn't arbitrary at all. That's a well defined binary actually. Also. The term homophobe, which is inaccurate to start with, doesn't even apply in this case. I think the common social justice term is "Transphobe".

That is well-defined, I mean arbitrary as in what is too silly or weird.

Not all whites are wealthy, and it's silly to assume a person is privileged merely because they are white.

Obviously, I don't mean all whiteskins are wealthy, but usually they relatively are. And yes, it does give privilege to whiteskins if whiteskins are the majority, see earlier post.

For example, SJWs on the campus of Princeton have asked that a building named after Woodrow Wilson be removed and given a new name because he was a Democrat who favored segregation.

They've also made similar proposals to rewrite or erase historical figures from campuses, such as Thomas Jefferson or George Washington.

And for example, rightists like the KFF kill Serbs since they are Serbs, while Joseph Kony led his fighters to war crimes to build a Christian theocracy. The point is, I bet there's extremes in every group, but don't normalise it based on these extremists.

A very infuriating group of radical leftists who take liberal tenets to such extremes they cease being liberal anymore. According to SJWs anyone who's a white,straight,male is evil, and minorities are incapable of doing anything wrong. If you say anything that is "offensive", you are an evil person who will be attacked by the SJW mob.

Social Justice Warriors claim to stand for rights and liberty, but they are one of the single biggest threats to freedom in developed countries. Stepping on freedom of speech under the guise of protecting minority interests.

I think you're exaggerating here, but I know the kind. They've hated my guts ever since I said that Nile-Saharans were on average more feisty than other folks due to genetic differences in brain chemistry (I actually found out later that I got this from a dubious (and wrong) source). But I am forever racist. Later, I said that Dutch and North Germanic folk are taller on average though (which is actually true), and noone got flibbergiblety about how I was promoting Neonazi supremacism of the Germanic race. Midgets need to rise up.

Edited 3/2/2016 05:55:12

Alexander Hamilton was:

1). One of the few real abolitionists in the 1790s

2). If it wasn't for his economic system, America would've been bankrupted.

^He also single-handedly weakened the power of state's rights and promoted the first overreaches of the Constitution by promoting a loose constructionist view of the document. In general this is my opinion: Thomas Jefferson >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexander Hamilton.

The only legacy for Hamilton now is an embarrassing Broadway Play that relegates his ideas and life to a series of raps and songs watched for the daily amusement of people who probably don't even know what the constitution is.

Wth!-Is this super duper billion*4 genderfluid glibbertyjibberty very confusing
standardisation?-I don´t get it....It´s just stupid.....This comes from a bisexual!


SJW´s=communists=extremists....
Extremists no good no matter if left or right.....shoot ´em dead, I say.