<< Back to Off-topic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 30 of 150   1  2  3  4  5  Next >>   
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:21:40


Luna {TJC}
Level 56
Report
ITT discuss politics...
Little political compass here if anyone interested haven't done it for a few years so can't remember how accurate it is.

https://www.politicalcompass.org/test






What your country:
What party is ruling it:
what's your opinion on them:
What party did you vote for/will you:
What's the best/worst party in country and or most dangerous




And anything else you want to discuss eg American elections best policy's ect.

Even old government such as Rome's



Minutes with out arguments: No informaton
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:22:25


Luna {TJC}
Level 56
Report
Feck I spelt the title wrong damn it phone.
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:35:27


SirSalty
Level 49
Report
Economic Left/Right: -1.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:37:41


[WOLF] The Conservative
Level 56
Report
DAM IT! im a left wing libertarian!!!!!!!!!!! NO!!!!!!!!!!! I wanted to be a right wing. well shit * Shakes Rand Pauls Hand * guess I have joined the dark side
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:51:17


Belgian Gentleman 
Level 56
Report
What's your country: Belgium

What party is ruling it: N-VA (Flemmish Nationalists)
what's your opinion on them: They have 1 major front leader that gets almost all of the votes within the party and they steal votes from other Flemmish nationalist parties like Vlaams-Belang.

What party did you vote for/will you: N-VA ( Flemmish nationalists)

Best party is N-VA (Flemmish nationalists).
They praise us for anything and blame wallonia for everything. =best thing ever!

Worst party is any walloon nationalist party. Those Walloon rats blame us for everything and praise themselves like gods.

Most dangerous party: N-VA (Flemmish nationalists). They claim to make Flanders an independent state in the future. They already have more than 60% of the votes in Flanders so.. the chances can be likely.
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:51:59


Luna {TJC}
Level 56
Report
Here have your flag



Edit: why does everyone post just before you :(

Edited 11/6/2015 22:53:19
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 22:53:53


[AOE] JaiBharat909
Level 56
Report
Taking this now...oh man first question is a killer: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."

Why isn't there an option of: No globalization should be stopped.


LOL belgiam gentlemen. You voted for what you think is the most dangerous party?


Personal Score:
Economic Left/Right: -.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 1.79

Country: USA

Party Ruling It: Democrats in WH, Republicans in Congress

What's Your Opinion on Them: Ruling parties are selling out our country to multinational companies, illegal immigrants, criminals, and those who want a New World Order

What Party Will you Vote for: Republicans (not like Americans have many choices) or Pat Buchanan (as a write in candidate)

Most Dangerous Party - Republicans and Democrats (they're controlled by the same people)

Edited 11/6/2015 23:05:02
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:01:19


berdan131
Level 56
Report


The questions are very biased and in fact there is hardly any economical question but instead of economy they ask about big corporations morality. This asks us about political opinion, not economic questions!

So don't believe in this quiz, this is shit. And many questions are unclear, because they have different answer based on which context we assume.

Edited 11/6/2015 23:02:26
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:02:03


Belgian Gentleman 
Level 56
Report
Nice drawing skills luna , I bow to you


Yes I voted for the most dangerous party because I don't believe in socialism that was proposed in the opposition. Due socialism we have to pay more and more taxes.
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:06:05


[AOE] JaiBharat909
Level 56
Report
Oh I understand. Are you a euroskeptic?
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:19:33


Belgian Gentleman 
Level 56
Report
No, EU is more liberal.

If the EU wouldn't exist then Belgium would be pretty worthless. EU actually enriches Belgium. I don't see any issue with the European union.
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:33:47


SirSalty
Level 49
Report
Country: The United Kingdom
Party in office : The Conservatives
Opinion: I hate them and I hate Cameron.
Next election: I will vote for labor
Most dangerous party : UKIP

Edited 11/6/2015 23:34:05
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:57:24


Eklipse
Level 57
Report
Economic Left/Right: -5.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.03

Country: The United States
Party in Office: Democrats in White House/Republicans in Congress
Opinion: I'm not fully satisfied with either party. I SLIGHTLY favor Republicans over Democrats, but greatly desire a third party that better represents my views.
Next Election: I'll most likely go with the Republicans unless an independent/third-party candidate who I support and has a good chance of winning steps up.
Best/Worst/Most Dangerous: Both will wreck this country in one manner or the other should we allow them to. It's a matter of picking which type of poison you prefer.

Edited 11/7/2015 00:00:09
Polictical Views: 11/6/2015 23:57:53


[AOE] JaiBharat909
Level 56
Report
What really you see UKIP as dangerous? I track British politics pretty closely and they seem to have the best interests of British working and middle class folks. The massive influx of immigration has long term negatives associated with it that politicians and EU social reformers and progressives cannot begin to foresee and imagine. And I am not being a racist here...it doesn't matter the religion or ethnicity of the immigrants. The scale currently allowed by Germany, the EU, and the last liberal government before Cameron took over are going to fundamentally transform Europe and England. I hope UKIP pushes hard for UK to leave the EU.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 00:10:38


DomCobb
Level 46
Report
Country: 'MURICA
Party Ruling: Democrats
Opinion: Dislike their extent of Obamacare and dislike their move to get out of Iraq.
If I could vote, I would vote Republican (unless Trump). But, I dislike both parties and would vote third party.
Worst Party: The closest party to Fascism.
Results: Economic Left/Right: -3.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.92

Better quiz:
https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

CRAP: I side with Trump and Hillary with 79%

Edited 11/7/2015 00:47:55
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 00:13:36


Luna {TJC}
Level 56
Report
Most dangerous: Greens (won't get significant powers for a long time (or ever hopefully)) and SNP have some fairly crack policy's one threatons national security and the other threatens the unity of the UK.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 00:30:00


OxTheAutist 
Level 58
Report
Greens and SNP are the two best parties in the UK out there. Labour, under Corbyn is pretty good right now, though.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 00:37:53


OxTheAutist 
Level 58
Report
I've taken the survey twice, seeing as elections are twice where I live.




What your country: Scotland
What party is ruling it: SNP
what's your opinion on them: They deserve more power. They make the best decisions, and Scotland deserves independence. At least for the next few months, before full on independence, they deserve devo-max.
What party did you vote for/will you: SNP, of course! Scotland!
What's the worst party in country and or most dangerous: The Scottish Conservative and Unionists: They have "Unionists" in their name! You know how bad that is.




What your country: United Kingdom
What party is ruling it: The Conservatives
what's your opinion on them: Absolute shite. David Cameron is a pig-fucker and has terrible views.
What party did you vote for/will you: SNP, of course.
What's the best/worst party in country and or most dangerous: BNP. Extremist, racist views. Luckily, they haven't got any seats, and are ridiculously unpopular.




My political compass:



I think this accurately pinpoints my political views. Most of my views revolve around socialism, despite favouring a semi-nationalist party. In no way are SNP pride-blind of Scotland. They just have set goals for their country, and they are willing to put in the hard work to achieve those goals. SNP may have "Nationalist" in the title, but they do not have extreme nationalist views. All we want is independence :D

I also favour semi-libertarian views. While I am a strong believer in taxes, and that the more affluent members of society should be taxed more than the poorer citizens, I think that a nanny-state is terrible, and that the government should only interject if they are protecting their citizens from being harmed in any way.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 00:56:49


indibob 
Level 61
Report
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.44

Strange thing is that despite being polar opposite with Eklipse on this test, his comments completely reflect my own.
I also don't see myself as republican or Democrat but will likely end up voting Republican (depending on who the nominee is). I find it a real shame that there is no real mechanism for moderates to succeed politically in the USA.

Agree with New Luna that "green" motivated parties are most dangerous to our future
Most pressing instance is of course the Keystone pipeline which with a combination of Obamas love for Middle east Muslims and the Democratic parties obsession with "green" policies we shall continue to rely on unstable suppliers rather than our allies from the north for a large portion of our fuel.
Crazy and dangerous
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 01:21:42


indibob 
Level 61
Report
"Better quiz:
https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
CRAP: I side with Trump and Hillary with 79%"


yes, a good quiz, most opinions are catered for...
85% Trump here... although putting an X by his name would be a scary choice, i may just have to do it
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 01:55:12


Eklipse
Level 57
Report
Strange thing is that despite being polar opposite with Eklipse on this test, his comments completely reflect my own.

I think pretty much anyone who doesn't neatly fit on the common "Left to Right" spectrum feels like both the Democrats and Republicans fail to represent a good chunk of the populace.

I find it a real shame that there is no real mechanism for moderates to succeed politically in the USA

I agree fully. We need someone who can take the best of both parties and bring them together. Someone who can negotiate between both sides of the aisle and not blindly blame everything on the "stupid liberals" or "evil conservatives".
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 02:15:33


berdan131
Level 56
Report
I think the most important questions, which are not in these quizes and which should be, are:
questions which talk about:

How to change laws to make it easier for small businesses and new ones to enter market with their products.

Rewrite laws and make it easier and understandable for common citizen, deregulate markets.

Give more sovereignty to states.

Generally make laws better and less bureaucratic

and hundreds more

Edited 11/7/2015 02:17:55
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 04:26:24


[AOE] JaiBharat909
Level 56
Report
BNP is a defunct and dead party in Britain. No need to label them dangerous...they don't exist.

The SNP is dangerously incapable of handling their own finances in my opinion, but I agree with self-determination sentiments. Catalonia, Flanders, Scotland, Transnistria, Donetsk and Luhansk, Kosovo, etc should all receive referendums on independence. The only reason they've been placed within their native countries is because of WWII and Cold War map divisions.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 07:43:38


knyte 
Level 58
Report
Compass:

Economic Left/Right: -7.88 (left)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.41 (libertarian)



ISideWith:

http://www.isidewith.com/elections/2016-presidential/1487731291

98% Sanders
93% Hillary
80% O'Malley
36% Paul
23% Bush
19% Trump
7% Carson
6% Cruz
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 08:52:45


Belgian Gentleman 
Level 56
Report
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 09:22:57


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
Taking this now...oh man first question is a killer: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."


Why on Earth is this a killer? Did you really have to think about this one? The answer was so easy, I think this frain makes asking bias. No, I favour transnational corporations rather than humanity, sorry.

Country: The United Kingdom
Party in office : The Conservatives
Opinion: I hate them and I hate Cameron.
Next election: I will vote for labor
Most dangerous party : UKIP


^Mostly my choice if I lived in Britain; UKIP are on the verge of fascism (Foreigners - out!) We are not European anymore, we are Atlantic, sorry. We're converting our armoury to harpoons as we speak.). Labour is, I think, the best party, but it's only the smallest evil. It's still pretty right, but who is left? The "drugs are cool" party and "Respect" party?

What really you see UKIP as dangerous? I track British politics pretty closely and they seem to have the best interests of British working and middle class folks. The massive influx of immigration has long term negatives associated with it that politicians and EU social reformers and progressives cannot begin to foresee and imagine. And I am not being a racist here...it doesn't matter the religion or ethnicity of the immigrants. The scale currently allowed by Germany, the EU, and the last liberal government before Cameron took over are going to fundamentally transform Europe and England. I hope UKIP pushes hard for UK to leave the EU.


Let me start off by saying that most every party says that they have the best interests of the middle class. That's where the vote is supposed to come from. Now, immigration supposedly causes negatives. Really? This is just a myth and it's been disproved so many times. Immigration is a net gain to a population; there's been so many studies done on this, here are a few:

https://hal.inria.fr/file/index/docid/800617/filename/13013.pdf (survey on 22 OECD countries)

http://www.cebi.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/documents/PDF/wp25_Economic_effects_of_immigration.pdf (specifically relating to Britain)

http://www.oecd.org/migration/OECD%20Migration%20Policy%20Debates%20Numero%202.pdf (OECD talk)

Immigrants? Get as many as you can. What long-term negatives does it have associated with it, other than perhaps "cultural collapse"? You can't see a nonexistent obstacle, so just pretend it doesn't exist. The scale allowed by Germany is normal. The scale allowed by Britain and most OECD countries: statistically negligible (10,000 is nothing. To put it in perspective, Jersey has 100,000 folk; Mann has 85,000; Guernsey has 65,000; Tortola (in the British Virgin Islands) has 20,000).

What's the point of leaving the EU? Leaving from a free market of other countries, to co-operate with France and Germany to get their economies as strong as possible, and for what? The Commonwealth? A shipping nightmare?

If the EU would solidify, it could become more powerful than America; but the nationalist UKIP would never be bit of that project.

Most dangerous: Greens (won't get significant powers for a long time (or ever hopefully)) and SNP have some fairly crack policy's one threatons national security and the other threatens the unity of the UK.


Greens aren't dangerous; they're just going to legalise some weird things, and lower the authoritarianism. As for SNP, I agree with most of their policies, but I don't agree with Scotland leaving Britain.

The SNP is dangerously incapable of handling their own finances in my opinion, but I agree with self-determination sentiments. Catalonia, Flanders, Scotland, Transnistria, Donetsk and Luhansk, Kosovo, etc should all receive referendums on independence. The only reason they've been placed within their native countries is because of WWII and Cold War map divisions.


Well, Pridnestrovia, Donetsk, Luhansk, and Kosova are independent, voted to be independent already, declared independence; it's just recognition. Also self-determination hurts everyone involved in the long-run. In unity, it's stronger; would America be so strong as 51 independent countries?

And also, for obvious grounds: it won't matter. No country will let go of their land for naught.


My country: Belarus
Ruling party: Lukashenka: Party-independent (fits most to national socialism)
Opinions: Fine as far as parties go; he pulled Belarus out of the dashing 90s road that Russia went down, and now Belarus has one of the lowest nonworking rates (<0.5%), and very high income equality and is somewhat stable, in a mild economic slipspace.
Vote: Lukashenka. He's not great, but communist party, nationalist party, far-right party, mild-right party...he's definitely the best.
Dangerous: United Civic Party and various exopartisans.

And no, Belarus is not the only country in Europe to have the death punishment, against folk's belief.

My score on this compass:
-2.75; 0.1 (right on the line); a socialist

Edited 11/8/2015 05:12:35
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 09:42:11


Belgian Gentleman 
Level 56
Report
But Infection , don't you live in America?
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 11:00:47


MoD lover ❤️
Level 16
Report
No ukip have a bad way of looking at things before they changed it last year, their group had their eyes set on shifting British citizens who they deemed "immigrants" even though most was born here and their parents before them was as well,even though most have a job and pay taxes they are deemed as "benefits stealers" even though half the people on benefits are English and have all experienced one go on the Jeremy Kyle show.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 11:02:03


MoD lover ❤️
Level 16
Report
Thanks juq, that's exactly how I look at it.
Polictical Views: 11/7/2015 11:03:25


MoD lover ❤️
Level 16
Report
They are similar to a Facebook page called Britain first, where it's false propaganda against anyone who isn't British. Check them out its unbelievably crazy.
Posts 1 - 30 of 150   1  2  3  4  5  Next >>