aha AWF will have to join in the challenge, olympus vs CORP vs AWF, we'll settle this.

Again people make trash lists...

@Benjamin: I just looked at your last ladder game against TeddyFSB.
https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=9467313

If you went to M'Hunters school like I did you would have known that your 4v2 attack to Malaysia had to happen last order. When playing properly after picks you should have probably won against the former [20] player TeddyFSB. This is stuff that you don't learn by thinking about some trash rankings. Don't they teach you such stuff in the AWF?

My advice for everyone here is to stop making rankings about clans way beyond their skill level but actually learn from them. M'Hunters has published a great strategy guide. Read it, meditate over it and try to apply it.

Edited 9/19/2015 23:59:35

You are statistically more likely to take it with a 4v2 when attacking last order, that's just maths mate, you're arse kissing is making you and M'Hunters look bad

Yep, is just simple maths... but Benjamin didn't know it... he just randomly assumed that AWF and M'Hunters were at the same skill level. Here is the mail I received from the M'Hunters guy that I asked a while ago.

-------------------
Assumption: First you move 4v2 then your opponent moves with 4. Let's determine your opponents chances of getting the territory:

4 attackers have 40% chance of killing 3 (60% chance of killing only 2)
2 defenders have 31% chance of killing 2 (69% chance of killing only 1)

Opponent wins if "Your attacks lose 2" OR (Your attacks lose 1 AND he kills 3)
OR = needs to be added
AND = needs to be multiplied

Chance opponent wins = 31% + (69%*40%) = 58,6%

- If the opponent attacks only with 3 then getting last order with your 4v2 attack is even more obviously better.
- The reason the guy who moves later has better chances when both attack with 4 is mainly that 4 armies kill 2.4 on average what has quite some chance to result in 3 kills.

Edited 9/20/2015 00:07:07

Look, I can't understand why they wouldn't let you in the clan, yet they allow people with 20% 1v1 ratings, and guys who've not been on for like close to 200 days. You must be like one of their leader's alt trying to big the clan up without looking like it's boasting.

Well, CORP has kind of been hijacked right now so... not much you can say. Anyway 3rd time in 5 months. That's a record, I think.

Edited 9/20/2015 09:12:33

@[IM] YouMustBeKidding


I find it funny that you are insulting people's opinions of who the best clans are, and yet your insight is even more flawed as the people you are critiquing.

And then he ranked the Icelandic Turtles below the French community...

Icelandic Turtles are good, but French is better. As mentioned before, they are an A League Clan, and many of their members are very good. Additionally, their Ladder track record is far greater than that of the Icelandic Turtles, with some players such as Niko and Wazz taking the top spot in the 1v1 and Real-Time Ladder respectively.

And you still have not provided a list of your own supposedly "superior" opinion of clan rankings. Quite laughable.

My advice for everyone here is to stop making rankings about clans way beyond their skill level but actually learn from them. M'Hunters has published a great strategy guide. Read it, meditate over it and try to apply it.

While I agree, the M'Hunters guide is very good beginning and intermediate guide to WarLight strategy, it doesn't come close to supporting what you are saying here. Why shouldn't people make lists of clan rankings as they see fit? Given that some are obviously not held to popular belief on what the "best" clans are, they are only opinions. No need to bash players who are bold enough to state which clans they think are better than others.

I don't know much about AWF and M'Hunters, but I believe that although M'Hunters are better in terms of average player skill, both AWF and M'Hunters are equal in terms of the skill of their top members.

Well, CORP has kind of been hijacked right now so... not much you can say. Anyway 3rd time in 4 months. That's a record, I think.
Now, that's kinda funny, no?

You must be like one of their leader's alt trying to big the clan up without looking like it's boasting.
I'm mainly a roleplay guy (not classic diplo) but I also enjoy strategic games from time to time. My home is another clan but I do respect authority on different fields than mine.

And you still have not provided a list of your own supposedly "superior" opinion of clan rankings. Quite laughable.
I don't understand? OK... talking about crappy lists and making my own list kinda doesn't fit together however I have provided multiple lists with clan rankings, just not in this thread. I even made a thread ranking M'Hunters in different areas.

Edit:
Why shouldn't people make lists of clan rankings as they see fit? Given that some are obviously not held to popular belief on what the "best" clans are, they are only opinions. No need to bash players who are bold enough to state which clans they think are better than others.
Why shouldn't people make lists as they see fit? Well, because this is just the same clique who keeps pating themselves on the back. Ladder ranks or clan league mean nothing any longer, just how many followers you can convince that you are the best. WG wins clan league --> means nothing, since 20 didn't participate.

Edited 9/20/2015 01:04:10

Yeah sure, hidden email adress, joined quite recently, decent stats for someone who started from scratch, play coin games after having only been on a couple months, low boot rate, high percentage realtime games. I'm guessing Norman https://www.warlight.net/Profile?p=5917719105

That was a mistake hitting Malaysia first order. Am I the best player in AWF? Not close.

Edited 9/20/2015 20:58:02

Ben prepare for your clan to be destroyed in this 8v8 tournament :D

Who is Lu Fredd? Spanish in the top 30??

The lists are useful for the top 15 I guess. After that, the classification is biased because some clans look for other things rather than ladders or inter-clan games.

And also, Clans must be reviewed with numbers, with statistics as Knyte do. If a clan has 1 or 2 good players out of 40, the clan grade should be poor even if those are among the best of the game.

Said that, I see that no one puts USSR even in top 30 what proves my point that not every clan has the same goals. Many clans are underrated and overrated in my opinion.

Well given that you're a RP clan, and these lists are skill/strategy I'm not really surprised. Lu Fredd are a clan with the symbol DD.

Wait, wheres the complete analysis for the rest of the clans. *taps foot impatiently* Comeon Mister Turtle

Will add a few clans momentarily but I don't have much time =(

@Hades: I ensure you, the Council of M'Hunters bears no relation to YMBK.

Moreover, as was said before, we have declined him due to troll posts.

Masters and Blitz have a write up.... Poor quality but... I wrote something of my opinion. I will get to XS and the rest when I can.

so where is the write up :)

1st post....

@ AyanM cool man, it's quite clearly norman, same country as well, stats too good for a newbie, similar percentage of RT games, both low boots, profiles set up same way, he was winning coins 2 months in too, it's so obvious man. Like, sorry, if you need to create an alt to big your clan up, that's kind of pathetic. And don't make it so obvious! All they guy talks about on forums is M'hunters, and why? What possible reason does he have if he's not even in your clan lol. ahh, funny stuff anyway.