I hope you're not referring to cnn.com???? They've seemed pretty accurate so far. For the record, I completely agree that Fox News is bullsh*t.

I'm literally not joking. Check this out:

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/cnn/

Although I believe this is referring to the TV network rather than cnn.com, i'm not really sure how they're different.

Fox is a lot worse :P

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/fox/

When the news stations fail us, we must do our own research. Unfortunately, nobody does that.

Finding reliable, unbiased sources is difficult when it comes to politics.

hilary cares about only her own foundation and shouldnt be trusted XD she has more conspiracies then trump has money XD...chris christie shouldve ran in 2012 and rubio is a senator and to young to be responsible...my vote is for scott walker or rick perry... also fox news is trustworthy when it comes to bill o'rielly and sean hannity

also fox news is trustworthy when it comes to bill o'rielly and sean hannity

I can't believe I just read that. Bill/Sean are trustworthy? O.O

Maybe I'm missing something here but they're well known to have biased agendas and are known for telling a lot of lies...

I cannot vouch for CNN's TV coverage, as I have not watched a single news source on TV since.... about fifteen years ago. But cnn.com and Google News have not disputed each others' information on any article that I have read, to my knowledge. Perhaps that just means I'm only reading the articles that both of them cover, so it is possible that cnn.com's other articles are less reliable; perhaps cnn.com has lied about information and I have not caught it while reading; or perhaps both cnn.com and Google News are both lying about the same information. Whatever the case may be, I have not had a reason to distrust cnn.com as a source of news, but I will take into account your words.

Edited 6/23/2015 23:56:29

But hey, back on topic: can we all agree that US elections are crap?

At least we get to choose our monarch, Saudi Arabia get rekt.