TLDR at the bottom
Hey Warlighters, Warzoners and conquerers (!!!)
I've been playing 'Someone stole my oil' where the
Boss
2 value (
B2v)
has 3 stages. (1st: 20), (2nd: 60) and (3rd: 300) and looked up different threads of how to beat the Boss2 type. With lot of time invested, unfortunately I didn't find a specified agreed upon answer.
Some players mentioned that the Boss is equivalent to a
Commander's
value (
Cv)
which is 7. But when up against 3rd stage boss with 600 armies, the 600 always loses. Which means that the Boss2 type is not an addition type increaser, like a regular commander usually is. Also because when I presented the problem in the ChatRoom, it was mentioned that you need 45 (38 + your own commander) to beat the 1st stage (20). And ofc, you would think that
20+Cv
would equal to 27, which would (According to the advice from ChatRoom) make Boss2 to be classified beatable if you attack it with 38+Cv.
But 3rd stage doens't add up to the equation when you go against it with
600+Cv
(600 armies can beat 360 armies) which would be reasonable to win the game.
Then in thread
https://www.warzone.com/Forum/241885-advise-against-boss is adviced to use 675 armies to defeat 3rs stage. In that thread the equation is presented following:
N = total armies from boss
N/60*100= needed armies to kill boss
and the following example
so for example the boss itself is 400 armies and his income is 5 and he has no other armies on his boss then you need to kill 405 armies (400+5 (from income))
so N is 405
405/60*100=675
that means you need 675 armies attacking to kill the boss in 1 time
But
N minus
income seems to look like another
Bv that was used, likely Boss1 or Boss4 type.
Then I compared the advice from ChatRoom's expected value of Stage 1 of the Boss2 type, and the example from the thread I just presented you, tried to find if they had another equal B2v value by using multiplication.
I got curious if it multiplied, so I made several attempts to find the value.
x1.35 I am not entirely sure, as I only made the theory based on the direct advice from ChatRoom and the thread. But it might be a step closer to the answer :)
I would be glad if several players could either confirm or deny the thesis based on my guesswork and calculation.
Good luck ;D
TLDR:
Not sure, might be wrong:
20 x 1.35 = 27 (To beat:
45 armies, or 38 + Commander)
60 x 1.35 = 81 (To beat:
135 armies, or 127 + Commander)
300x1.35 = 405 (To beat
675 armies, or 668 + Commander)
