<< Back to Ladder Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 5 of 5   
3v3 Europe Ladder Polls: 4/18/2013 05:11:38

Qi 
Level 55
Report
Which template would you prefer?
http://poll.pollcode.com/1g77f

Fixed teammates or random teammates?
http://poll.pollcode.com/6v39i
3v3 Europe Ladder Polls: 4/18/2013 05:49:16


professor dead piggy 
Level 59
Report
3 picks random warlords 0% luck weighted. 4 picks is so 2012. Why do you europe players insist that the map is saturated with picks? Why are you against giving players a tiny bit of space, and opportunity to complete some bonuses?
3v3 Europe Ladder Polls: 4/18/2013 05:51:59


professor dead piggy 
Level 59
Report
Oh I just realised the answer to my own question. Its because the map itself is homogenous garbage, the only interest comes from bashing your tiny stacks into one another so you might as well get it started from turn 1. Which is also why the luck settings are so important to you.
3v3 Europe Ladder Polls: 4/18/2013 07:26:45


szeweningen 
Level 60
Report
Please stop being stupid piggy, it gets really annoying.
3v3 Europe Ladder Polls: 4/18/2013 07:39:59

Qi 
Level 55
Report
It's a fair question. Imbalanced coverage is an issue with 3 in warlords: the pick lottery could make 1-2 teammates rather useless, leading to asymmetrical fighting (ie, 2v1s, 3v2s that decide the game). In cities it eliminates the possibility of picking (and safely completing in one turn) bonuses worth 5 and 6 armies (Poland, England, SW Russia, Sweden, etc.). But for autodistribution I think 3-5 picks is best.
Posts 1 - 5 of 5