No one wants to get the ball rolling?

Standard strategy for games very similar to this (I play real time mafia with Gnuff) is to not lynch the first day. If you agree with this, I suggest engineering a tie. If you disagree, and a majority backs you with some sort of reason behind it, I'm happy to concede but I'd have no idea who to go for. MMB?

Also, real time mafia gives you the option to literally vote: nobody.

Edited 8/31/2014 17:35:10

I dont know how its ended up as a standard play for you because it is for sure a misplay. We need to lynch all the Mafia before they shoot us all. If we Dont lynch day one we just lose the chance to do so and then one of us is shot as a freebie.

I realise there are three teams but I Dont see how that changes things.

If I didn't know better I'd want to lynch you right now.

Arun, I'll spell it out for you.

Lynching nobody gives no information. We'll go into Day 2 with just the night kills as 'info', and basically have Day 2 as the same as Day 1, except for one less villager!

*side Q - can wolf faction 1 night kill another wolf?



And I fully endorse the idea to lynch the lurkers.

I've only played one of these games here before and that was on realtime, but I agree with Hisballs and Dom, if we don't lynch anyone, we just get shot and then what?

Considering there are two teams, there could be alot more Mafia than we are expecting and a lucky Lynch is more possible than in other games.

Yes, the mafia teams are opposing each other so in order to win they have to eliminate not only each other but the neutral party too.

EDIT:
It's basically a team FFA, everything goes. Last team standing wins.

Edited 8/31/2014 19:16:02

Oh crud do I still have time to join?

I vote Arun for no particular reason at all :p

Oh crud do I still have time to join?

No it's too late.

Lawlz why are you trying to start a vote against one of the only randoms? Suspicions have raised.

Arun might be wrong, but alteast he's trying.

Vote Lawlz

Im not trying to start a vote for anybody. I just decided I'd vote for anybody since theres nothing to go off....

Vote Lawlz

It makes zero sense to vote anyone active. You're much more suspicious than anyone else at the moment.

I also vote Lawlz

He call me MysteryTroll , very offensive

(I cannot type in font)

omigod, if we dont vote, we get killed anyways.


You know what? forget it....Im out

Edited 9/1/2014 09:38:04

Lawlz. Argue your case. That's the whole point of the game. For some reason they are happy to try to start the bandwagon. ???

For my part I am giving blue a last chance to actually take part in discussion or that is where I will vote. For the 1000th time, this game relies solely on active participation.

Villagers. Speak up. Any theories forming yet?

Frank? Did his post sound fishy. To claim that random is the only option this early is classic mafia. If we start discussing things it won't have to be.

Any villagers want to claim a role yet?

I'm putting weak theories out there I know. Discusss...

Edited 9/1/2014 09:51:15

Definitely no bandwagon attempt. I just think after voting me seemingly randomly, he is most suspicious.

I said my reason

To reiterate. We need conversation. We need information. The idea is that people lying will eventually be caught out as there story will lack consistency. Villagers have nothing to hide so should be speculating a plenty.

Mafia can, and often do lurk as a viable tactic. They know the talkative ones just draw attention to themselves and that talking increases the chance of being caught. We know they may do this so talking separates them out. If no one talks we lose that possible tell.

In this setup there is apparently no rule against not talking at all. Those people should go either because they are mafia or because they don't understand how the game works.