<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 30 of 68   1  2  3  Next >>   
new idea!: 10/17/2012 15:41:06


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
i was thinking of doing a gameplay campaign thing where for example if we where doing ww2 as a game we wouldn't just play that game straight away beforehand we would play parts of the ww2 map. for example at start of war Germany invaded poland so we could have a poland against germany and russia on poland map with three. players and who ever won that game would have poland in the big game at the end. other examples that we would play for other parts of the game for the custom seniror at the last game.
-nethalands and belguim
-france
-russia
-scandinavia
-greece
-africa
-china
-indonesia
-phillopenes
-pracific
-australia
-africa
e.c.t
we would have one player for each nation and would play each game they are involved in.
countries we would have:
-Germany
-Great Britain
-USA
-France
-Italy
-Japan
-Poland
-Netherlands
-Belgium
-Australia
-China
-Russia
-Finland
-Norway
-Denmark
-African colonies
-and others that i might of fogoten
Also if poland was elimanated and they lost they wouldn't play in the big game they would be eliminated and germany and russia would have there land.

make sense ask me questions it's quite hard to get my idea across to you so if you don't understand ask.
i thought it might be a new and fun way of playing

thanks
new idea!: 10/17/2012 15:42:05


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
i know warflowvet came up with something like this but i looked at his and it's not the same
new idea!: 10/17/2012 16:07:00


{rp} Clavicus Vile 
Level 55
Report
Looks fun!
new idea!: 10/17/2012 16:24:34


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
Thanks would you be up to take part
new idea!: 10/17/2012 16:33:29


The Fire_mad32 Juggernaut (Away from game)
Level 12
Report
Id take part tooo!
new idea!: 10/17/2012 17:05:53


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
sorry to be a dick, but please start threads with someone informative in the title.

"new idea" is way to vague IMO. It makes following and searching for threads a pain.

It would be better to summarize your idea in the title.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 18:20:25


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
True I should of made it better
new idea!: 10/17/2012 19:12:40


Ironheart
Level 53
Report
I will like to play i think i get you.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 19:25:21


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
I think it is a cool idea, I just don't have the time.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 19:57:50


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
ok chris and it's mini games that count towards the big game at the end if that makes more sense
new idea!: 10/17/2012 21:42:32


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
Well, obviously Germany would play a much bigger role, so that player would be in almost every game. Some of the other players may only be in a single match.

I can play as long as I am not one of the major players (USA/Germany/Russia/UK/Japan)
new idea!: 10/17/2012 21:44:13


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
How would the mini games end? A time period? Or would someone have to win the game (eliminate everyone)? How would that work with major powers?

I would think you'd put a time period on it and whatever the battle lines are in that game, they transfer over to other ones?
new idea!: 10/17/2012 21:45:45

Darth Mylor {Warlighter}
Level 13
Report
lol thats the exact opposite of what i was about to say. I would like to join, as long as im a superpower, specificaly Germany or USA.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 21:52:56


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
I'm trying to think of better ways to work this perhaps there should be 3 to 4 players for a superpower so that your not in every game.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 21:56:34


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
And perhaps 20 turns or so intill it ends or less

With battles like Russia against Germany and Britain and USA against Germany and other major superpower battles would not happen intill the big game.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 21:57:35


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
Sorry for another post but mylor your in thanks we will decide teams later thought
new idea!: 10/17/2012 22:06:26


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
Another option:

Just get 10 people (or whatever the amount is) to play each side. Then assign those people parts in each game. You don't have to use the same amount each time (maybe a small battle just needs 3v3 and you grab 3 from each team.

Then you can assign portions of the large nations to each player. It would actually help battles and deployments be more realistic. If 1 person had all of Germany, they could place troops anywhere in the country instantly (on whatever map it is). Whereas if you had each person take a sub region, you could only deploy in that area. It would be a lot more realistic overall.
new idea!: 10/17/2012 22:11:41


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
An example would be if you do battle in Africa (on the big Africa map), you could give 1 German person Algeria, 1 German person Libya, then give all the surrounding areas to UK players (however many you needed).

The question is do you even have all the maps you'd need for this? Is there a detailed enough Europe map?
new idea!: 10/17/2012 22:14:15


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
And on that map I would just do giant wastelands behind the surrounding UK areas so you aren't playing on the whole map. If Germany takes all that is on the map, you can assume they would take rest of Africa after.

Or maybe you do greater Middle East map, I don't know. But it gives you more flexibility to just plug in however many people you need. Then you can also work around vacations easily since nobody is locked into a nation
new idea!: 10/17/2012 22:17:27


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
That all sounds very good and will take that in to account thanks :)
new idea!: 10/17/2012 23:47:14


Master Miyagi • apex 
Level 59
Report
i would play as Russia, Japan or China.
new idea!: 10/18/2012 00:48:47

Darth Mylor {Warlighter}
Level 13
Report
ALex, i happen to know a lot about history (especialy ww2) so i can help you with some of the battles, countries, etc.
new idea!: 10/18/2012 06:42:13


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
Ok IVF thanks.

Mylor that would be great I know a lot about ww2 aswell i will start making the maps soon and they will be ready in November to December as there are a lot to do. Thanks mylor
new idea!: 10/18/2012 14:48:51


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
ok im starting to make the maps for this game now im thinking of doing the poland game first

do you think i should use the very big poland 2.5k or the other big poland thats less territorys

also what fog level
new idea!: 10/18/2012 15:34:00

CheerfulTeenager#Naive!
Level 1
Report
Oh boy! What a marvelous idea. Count me in for sure!
new idea!: 10/18/2012 16:59:40


Ironheart
Level 53
Report
i think you should use 2.5k poland.
new idea!: 10/18/2012 17:54:49


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
I would always use as large as possible. you'd have a much more in depth battle and you can invite more players to partake in each side.
new idea!: 10/18/2012 17:56:07


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
Your advances would be more realistic (rather than taking half a country in a turn or something).

If you need, you can increase the length of the game on that map if it is really large.
new idea!: 10/18/2012 18:39:36


Mudderducker 
Level 57
Report
Year ok
new idea!: 10/18/2012 20:55:04


[WG] Warlightvet 
Level 16
Report
thats very similar to my idea, though mine was more specific.
anyway, i'd be very interested in joining :)
Posts 1 - 30 of 68   1  2  3  Next >>