<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 9 of 9   
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 03:18:25


{rp} Kingmaker 
Level 58
Report
This is a message to boot hungry players:

My team got unlucky and we agreed to surrender.

In the game chat I say "gg" and click surrender. Now I have not commited yet but we reach the 3 min limit for manual boot. One of the opppsing players, I believe he was called "Sad Individual", decided instead of accepting my surrender, to boot me dead on the 3 min mark.

The game had been amicable before. No antogonistic bantar or anything really. All I said to them was "gg" up to that point.

So I ask you please just accept surrenders. It's very unfriendly to boot unnecessarily! It's vindictive! It does not encourage people to play with you again!

End of rant

WO

I would post the game but IYF wanted to remain anonymous becuase he didnt want to be shown losing a 3v2. ooops! :(
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 03:20:26


Master Miyagi • apex 
Level 59
Report
Wilf you might as well post the game now you idiot,



http://WarLight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?GameID=3270549
-vivek is the culprit
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 03:27:58


{rp} Kingmaker 
Level 58
Report
sorry IYF. Im just messing with you! :P
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 10:04:32


Gnullbegg 
Level 49
Report
"you should vote now to retain your honour"


Nice try there, Willie. ;)
But how about you just set "surrenders must be accepted" to "no" in your 3v2 games? Might even help you in winning more of them...
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 10:16:32


Pink 
Level 60
Report
the thign is that some players surrender and leave the game while his team mates don t accept the surrender, solution? boot
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 10:26:35


Gnullbegg 
Level 49
Report

But how about you just set "surrenders must be accepted" to "no" in your 3v2 games?

It's actually an option called "surrenders happen instantly". No need to thank me.
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 10:42:18


{rp} Kingmaker 
Level 58
Report
I didn't host the games and so couldn't control the settings. but the turn had only passed 3 mins and was not like they had to wait for ages. After discussion with partner I had only just surrenderd and maybe the player waited 1 min form the surrrender to boot. I was going to finish and commit.

still no need to be so trigger happy with the boot button.
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/10/2012 13:31:00


Master Miyagi • apex 
Level 59
Report
and it was the player that didnt accept the surrender not me, then he booted.
WO Rant 3: Is it necessary?: 10/14/2012 12:55:57


[WG] Warlightvet 
Level 16
Report
noob, i never lose in 3V2 on that map :p
Posts 1 - 9 of 9