Maybe this has been suggested before, but here it comes. I was thinking a way to go about the 1v1 ladder would be to have a minimum number of games to get into top 100. (I suggest 75) and a minimum of 120 games before u can get into top 50. So if u have a rating of 2000 and only 25 games u are placed according to your rating after top 100. If this could be implemented I think a lot of the problems we see now are avoided. If this suggestion sounds good I also think the number of max games should be increased to 10. What do you think?

Kzy's ladder was permanently displayed on the Dashboard until it broke. I still don't know why it broke, and he ignores me when I ask him about it.

Sorry about that, but i finally responeded(also in the forum thread) :P

Also i would like to make a question to Fizzer (that i hope he will answer us):
change a template(s) in ladders should be a fast thing, right?

But no questions about banning cheaters, right ?


As for the topic - i can't see any reason for big changes. Hide RT ladder participants and prevent game stalling, but what besides that?
Templates for 1v1 and 2v2 are not expected to be changed. SL is not that prone to be gamed (Gui's last try would fail even without Fizzer's intervention, as penalty for missed games is high) and SL and RTL templates will never fit all.

guis try would have worked, he didnt miss any games, he just didnt finish any.

He played only 17, so -195 penalty.