I found there weren't any single player rankings, so I came up with a point system.
Level 1:
Over 11- 40 points
11- 45 points
10- 50 points
9- 60 points
8- 80 points
7- 120 points
6- 200 points

Level 2:
Over 22- 120 points
21-22- 135 points
19-20- 150 points
17-18- 180 points
16- 240 points
15- 360 points
14- 600 points

Level 3:
Over 31- 240 points
29-31- 270 points
26-28- 300 points
23-25- 360 points
21-22- 480 points
20- 720 points
19- 1,200 points

Europe Challenge:
Over 30- 300 points
28-30- 340 points
25-27- 375 points
22-24- 450 points
20-21- 600 points
19- 900 points
18- 1,500 points

Crazy Challenge:
Over 40- 500 points
36-40- 560 points
32-35- 625 points
28-31- 750 points
25-27- 1,000 points
23-24- 1,500 points
22- 2,500 points

Insane Challenge:
Over 50- 800 points
45-50- 900 points
39-44- 1,000 points
35-38- 1,200 points
31-34- 1,600 points
29-30- 2,400 points
28- 4,000 points

Rating:
Under 300- Just Started
300-600- Noob
601-1,200 Getting There
1,201-1,800 Amateur
1,801-2,500 Average
2,501-3,500 Rookie
3,501-5,000 Veteran
5,001-7,500 Champion
7,501-9,999 Master
10,000 Ultimate Warlight Player

My Rating: 1,680 Amateur

Why would a rating system be based solely on single-player games against the AI? That seems utterly ridiculous and boring.

Because some people are good against some strategies and not good against others. AI's don't have strategies. Also there's already a multiplayer rankings. It's called ladders. The only problem is Non-Members can't play on them.

I am well aware of that fact. It changes nothing. AI's are incredibly poor measuring sticks as their tendencies can be studied and thus make them easily beaten by a knowing opponent. There is very little skill to beating an AI opponent.

Add in the fact that they are high-risk games and it is even less about skill/ability at WL.

And shouldn't rookie rate lower than average?

Richard: Your comments are completely out of line. Some people just like playing single player. If you find it boring, just pass on the thread. There's no reason for you to jump in and put someone down.

I like your scoring system grady as I get top marks :-)

As limited as the AI's are, I still learnt valuable lessons about expansion, the use of cards and the importance of prioritising / delaying orders.

Getting the gold star for insane challenge when learning the game was one of the most difficult/frustrating/rewarding things I have done on a computer game!

I won level 2 in 13 turns.

What do.

Sorry Fizzer, I'll make sure not to provide my opinion in the future if I fear it will be contrary to the will of the people...

Fizzer dont take richard that seriously he does this with almost anything.

^ +1

I love playing single player late at night. I think it's fun that you made this. I like it.

Sharpe, you went out of your way to insult someone for doing something fun for the community who isn't asking anything of you or anyone else in return. You're allowed to have any opinion about anything in the world. But you need to realize that expressing those opinions will have consequences. Especially when those opinions are aggressively against something that doesn't affect you or anyone else's life in any perceivable negative way. If you want to interpret the consequence you received as the establishment of a standard that no opinion in this community may ever be expressed if it is contrary to "the will of the people" (whatever that means), then go ahead. But I think that's a pretty wild and inaccurate interpretation.

^ +1

since when is rookie higher than Average (or Amateur)?

This is not a bad idea, but need to do it in one time. I mean if you want to test your rating, start it (in many day, why not) but don't restart game if you are not enjoy with the time (number of turn) you take to finish one level.

Maybe i wiil try ;)

Interesting idea, there are players that i think are more indicated to calculate such a proper ranking, with even considering future record breakings.
Important to know what are the quickest available possibility in all levels

If you get under the lowest amount you still get the same number of points. Like if you get 13 turns on Level 2 then you still get 600 points.

Im not the biggest fan of single player, but this is a pretty neat way to make it more of a challenge. Although i agree with everyone else that rookie should be below average, but you can always change it.

I just put Rookie there to fill the spot, what should I put there instead that's between average and veteran (other than "above-average")