<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 10 of 10   
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/3/2012 14:10:28


{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
http://WarLight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?GameID=2877142

would you agree that my teammate made no contribution to the victory? :P
no offense to poop
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/3/2012 14:35:53


Bais
Level 26
Report
I would also agree that dynamyte made no contribution against your victory.
so yeah, congrats, you won a 1vs1..
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/3/2012 14:38:06


Min34 
Level 60
Report
Yes, you did the most.., but your teammate didn`t start nearby an enemy, so he did what was smart, expand. You have had a higher income than the other team since the start. Even if you got into trouble. Poop would be there in a few turns, if you moved towards him. You did everything just because you had bad luck. I do not say that you played bad. You played very well, but you can`t say anything about poop just because he started away from the enemy`s.
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/3/2012 14:40:04


{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
i didn't say anything bad, i just said he made no significant contribution. :P

Team A's total outcome outnumbered mine for more or less the entire game., but i guess light blue was stupid to start with italy
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/4/2012 14:34:25

Paul
Level 15
Report
Maybe you should start closer to each other next time. You know , teamwork is key to winning.
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/4/2012 15:25:06

Darkruler2005
Level 8
Report
Actually, it's pretty good to start a 2v1 battle early on. They spend more income on you than you'll need to defend with, and you can just escape/troll their territories while your ally builds up income. I think this is somewhat of a bad point for Warlight. If you 2v1 early on in a 2v2 game, you shouldn't be the loser (while for me that is often the case, regardless of the team I'm on). But, since that's the case, it's a good strategy. In this particular game, he may not have attacked the opponents (he couldn't reach them), but would have finished off the opponents if they got the upper hand over you. One of them got booted, so it might have actually been a bit problematic later on.
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/5/2012 17:52:46


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
Yeah, I have been in some 3v3s where I am in the middle of all 3 of the other people. All I do is deny them bonuses, play defense and stall. When my teammates finally get there, they have twice the income or more than their entire team. He couldn't have helped really, and if you started to get pushed back he would have eventually came in to save you with his mass of armies.
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/6/2012 10:33:07

Paul
Level 15
Report
You can't follow this strategy on narrow maps because your moves are very predictable(Roman Empire). If your enemies are half-decent, they'll eliminate you in no time on any map. (considering your picks are in the same region).
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/9/2012 11:43:31


{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
funny chris says "some 3v3s" when you can see only 1 completed 3v3 game in his profile. :D
Pointless teammate? :D: 7/15/2012 10:50:15


{RSP} Nike
Level 4
Report
yes, the roman empire map is a good example, unless you'r a top player or your enemies suck, they'l eliminate you quickly
Posts 1 - 10 of 10