<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 16 of 16   
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 15:57:24

MrBrightside
Level 2
Report
i donno why but sometimes i attack with x number of troops and instead in the history results that i made an attack of y number of troops. this was very weird the first time but today in particular this is happening to me a lot of times and before of attacking i doublecheck what the amount of troops is and still this bug makes it in a different amount. plus i hope that u will solve the double attack bug problem cos it happens to me a lot of time:(
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 15:58:27

Grzechooo 
Level 30
Report
Have you checked if the territory you're attacking from haven't been attacked before in the turn?
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:05:17

MrBrightside
Level 2
Report
yes. it wasnt attacked by anybody cos he had the first move, i know that it is very weird but it is so
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:27:13


[REGL] Pooh 
Level 60
Report
Gamelink?

Also, is it just the history? or does it play out incorrectly as well.
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:33:16

MrBrightside
Level 2
Report
gamelink is not of any use cos it turned out also in the game as i was attacking with 1 instead of 28, so if u check the history u'll just see that i ve attacked with one, but once again in the move order list on the right part of the creen it was clearly written that i was attacking with 28 but when i commit i attack just with one and the history confirms it. anyway i was thinking that it is a problem related to the double attack question.
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:34:30

MrBrightside
Level 2
Report
* donno why i wrote question, correct word is problem:P
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:35:18

The Duke of Ben 
Level 55
Report
A game link would be helpful. That said, you can set the attack for a larger number than there are troops available, by lowering the number of reinforcements sent there after setting the order.

For instance if you have a territory with 1 troop and add 10, you can create an order to move 10. If you create that order and then remove 9 troops, the order will still read "transfer/attack with 10" even though only 1 troop will move.
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:37:12

MrBrightside
Level 2
Report
yes i do know this thing but i didnt remove anything from that territory
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:47:12


À la recherche du temps perdu 
Level 35
Report
yeah i've now understood how this bug works! hey fizzer if i solve this can i have the lifetime membership like hurey, in fact is a similar bug to the one who he solved:)
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:49:28


Ace Windu 
Level 56
Report
If you put this in the bugs forum then your title would be implicit.
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:50:26


À la recherche du temps perdu 
Level 35
Report
what does it mean?
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:51:12


Bais
Level 26
Report
Oh god people are going to start treating bugs like currency now?..
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 16:58:35


À la recherche du temps perdu 
Level 35
Report
ok acewindu i understood ur comment. wm bais since hurey has solved a very similar bug and received the membership (that is a thing that my father wont ever permit me to have) i'm trying to have it in another way, and i dont feel so bad in doing it
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 19:24:27


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
i thought this would happen

now that two people have been given memberships for assistance in bug issues, everybody wants one (cos they can't or won't pay)


i just hope that people don't start making them up
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 22:00:36


x 
Level 58
Report
bais, i bet you 7 bugs they will.
fizzer i've detected a bug: 6/12/2012 22:43:48

RvW 
Level 46
Report
MrBrightside,

I know you think a game link is not necessary, but could you be so kind to provide one? It might help in figuring this out.

Also, if you look at such an order, you can hover your mouse over it and it will display some additional information (like this: http://i49.tinypic.com/241k0eu.png ). Can you double check whether the "original order sent" item matches what you entered? If it does, there's a (probably valid) reason why WL ended up using a lower number.
Posts 1 - 16 of 16