<< Back to Warzone Classic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 8 of 8   
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/3/2012 17:55:24


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
http://WarLight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?GameID=2750854


what could i do to make it more equal?
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/3/2012 18:21:31


Ironheart
Level 54
Report
give them all same income and same distant between them
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/3/2012 18:28:59


Moros 
Level 50
Report
Yup, the pair in Russia/Turkey has the worst start.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/4/2012 12:38:45


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
who would you say has the best start?
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/4/2012 13:30:04


Moros 
Level 50
Report
The Scandinavian player. Lots of armies, easy to defend and room for expansion. He also has a relatively high distance from the enemy, compared to the others.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/4/2012 13:43:53


Ⓖ. Ⓐrun 
Level 57
Report
ok cool



what can i do (specifically) to make it fair
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/4/2012 14:42:36


Ironheart
Level 54
Report
same income for them all and distance in territories between the other enemies
WHAT DO YOU THINK?: 6/4/2012 14:47:45


Perrin3088 
Level 49
Report
I disagree Moros.. since this is a FFA, Spain clearly has the worst start.. the only one on the map with -no- expansion options.. is clearly required to attack italy or live in their shadow in truce..

Italy has a good spot, good early expansion, only problem is the slightly superior starting armies of spain will almost be guaranteed in your hindquarter.. Russia/Turkey both have expansion, even though Turkey's is poor, Turkey has lower initial income than russia, leaving even less reason to start an initial war, while Russia will have decent expansion.. Britain will obviously expand into Iceland or down into Netherlands early, and Scand is a clear danger with the 2-1 border.. w/o truce a relatively early war would be fought over Western Norway....

Disregarding truces and each players relative personality, I actually think Russia has the best Initial spot, and Spain the worst.
Posts 1 - 8 of 8