i was replying to *your* comment.

i have an amendment to your 'guide to forum logic': "whenever somebody zings you, either (a) do not respond or (b) change the subject interlocutor interlocutor interlocutor interlocutor."

you provide an admirable example of both in this thread alone, gui.

i would like to add a part (c): "remind your interlocutor that you could kill them with your bare hands".

Okay, Gui is a bit arrogant but to be fair he has reasons to be.
So far out of all the discussions with gui, ace has been the only one who kept his arguments straight.
The rest is just dissolving into personal name calling allowing Gui to keep the moral high ground.
But to stay on topic, I like the idea Gui.

In case anyone wonders what Gui was referring to when mentioning *the OJ trial and the glove that didn't fit*:

|>American celebrity O. J. Simpson allegedly murdered two people, but was acquitted after a glove that was found near the crime scene and had his blood in it didn't fit.
However, it is often argued this might have been caused by arthritis medication he took, which made his hands swell, and if he didn't take those on the day of the murder, the glove could easily fit.

As for Gui, you are indeed being rather annoying lately. I mean, RvW is trying to comprehend your idea by making those 1-2-3-A-B-C diagrams, but you just make a troll comment.
I admit that X is swearing unnecessarily, and perhaps our judgement is getting a wee bit clouded by experiences from the past, but you're the one who caused those previous experiences.
As an obscure Dutch saying goes: *Faith comes afoot and goes ahorse.* (yes, ahorse *is* really an English word)

And the fact Gui doesn't swear doesn't mean he keeps high ground. He's used at least one topic solely to ridicule the people he disagrees with. It should hardly be a surprise that when he steps on people's toes, they yell back as soon as they see him again.

Now back on-topic, the original idea basically means you control your own team-mate, which makes Eagle's first comment relevant, and your trolling against RvW extra annoying.
Instead of confusing RvW, just say you've conceived a game concept in which you control all of a team's members.
I do think it's a pretty good idea, and I also think it should be for members only.
I just don't see why the description has to be so complicated.