<< Back to Strategy Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 13 of 13   
confused by this pick: 1/30/2018 22:28:07


Wally Balls 
Level 59
Report
I'm not saying it's a bad pick, I'm sure it's probably a good one actually. But I don't understand it. Can anyone explain the strategic reasons for it or the thinking behind it? What is the thought process behind this?

Specifically Pick 5 (Beijing)



Larger image: https://i.imgur.com/NeIzNmC.png

I'm thinking maybe it's some type of interaction with his other picks and the combinations he may end up with. Maybe if he winds up with it, it's highly likely to be in combination with 1 or more specific other picks -- or highly likely to be a counter pick.

Game is here: https://www.warzone.com/MultiPlayer?GameID=14878542
confused by this pick: 1/30/2018 22:37:56


Buns157 
Level 68
Report
I didn't think the best player on warzone got confused. :(

It's just a bad pick imo
confused by this pick: 1/30/2018 23:10:17


Wally Balls 
Level 59
Report
What's Warzone?
confused by this pick: 1/30/2018 23:22:47

inb4
Level 51
Report
I am confused too. Why did he pick that 5th when he could have picked it 1st?
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 00:10:28

kicorse
Level 59
Report
Hello! The guilty party here. Well, if Buns thinks it's a bad pick, I probably shouldn't dispute the point, but I'll try anyway.

I had played around with various 3,4,5 pick-orders of SEA, CR and WC/ER, and I wasn't happy with any of them. The problem was that getting my 3 & 5, or my 4 & 5, would always be bad.

Okay, CR and ER looks like a nice pair, but it's a pair that is easily countered (and which EC would be devastating against, though admittedly I wouldn't have had intel on ER).

So what were my options? I could pick the zone 4,5,6, but then I might get my 1,2,3, so I rejected that. 3,5,6 or 3,4,6 have similar problems.

Then it occurred to me that getting SEA + EC or getting CR + EC would be fine, partly because EC is a "bad" bonus that would be unlikely to be countered. Also EC is a nice long-term counter to every bonus in the region except Cauc. This seemed worth picking a bonus that requires three turns to take.

So yes, there was a logic to it. Whether you agree with it or not is another matter. But what would your 3,4,5,6 be, assuming you'd gone with my 1,2?
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 00:35:11


Bane 
Level 60
Report
Just pick all the good ones.
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 01:24:01

kicorse
Level 59
Report
Unconventional picks can be good. If you think this one isn't, and can provide an improvement, that's great, but "just pick all the good ones" is what I did when I initially joined the ladder. My results improved a lot once I started putting more thought in.
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 01:39:55


Rogue NK
Level 58
Report
You are still underestimating the magical mystical West China combo pick + Greenland. The most unconventional of them all.

Or better yet the East US/Central America combo + West China.

Edited 1/31/2018 01:45:59
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 01:50:27


Little-Mouse
Level 56
Report
@Kicorse
I think it is a good explanation, thank you very much for it :)
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 07:02:40


Buns157 
Level 68
Report
@kicorse

I could very well be wrong.

But I thought of it like this:

1- CA will be a first pick in this quite often between good players. So 50/50

2- knowing that players normally stick their 2nd pick nearby to cover it and hopefully get a good combo. SA

So this leaves your 3 4 5 too likely to be split between you and your opponent having only one of those picks. Especially if he picks something safe (scand) with a great bonus to expand into (Greenland).
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 09:52:21


Master Shinra 
Level 58
Report
Deleted

Edited 1/31/2018 09:57:14
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 13:33:01


Wally Balls 
Level 59
Report
Thanks for that explanation kicorse. Ya, I figured there was careful thought put into a pick like that.

Whether that specific pick was a good one, clearly there is a lot of sound reasoning in your thought process. Personally I think the game being pretty much over by getting my 4+5 and them picking East Russia, would make me not go for this combo.
confused by this pick: 1/31/2018 18:19:04

kicorse
Level 59
Report
Yeah, I acknowledge that the pick-set has the risks that you guys point out, but those are more about any 3,4,5 in Asia rather than the unconventional choice of EC at 5 specifically. I would maintain that my choice of 5 minimises those risks. Perhaps I should have just gone Scandinavia 3, which I assume is what Buns would have done(?). I just feared leaving Asia empty with no intel.

Anyway, I'm not sure how serious Rogue Nikolai Krogius was being with the CA/E-US suggestion, but a pick-set like

1 - SEA
2 - Scan
3 - CA
4 - SA
5 - E-US
6 - WC

might just work. The chances of your opponent having intel on E-US (likely a lost game) are pretty much zero. The chances of getting SEA, Scan and E-US are very good. Show up in Florida Turn 3, and two of your opponent's bonuses are in danger.
Posts 1 - 13 of 13