As i said i didn't wrote down the rating for each player individually. I can remember some, but not all 545 persons.

Edit: But yeah i gave the points how i did it. The top 2 categories are more subjective but for the others i listed clearly the requirements. I also said that if u hit your highest rating with a run f.ex. that that doesn't necessairly puts u in the higher category if u wasn't able to back that up with the next games.

Edit #2: I'll give u an example of my own.

I made an alt run on the 1vs1 ladder in october last year. I hit 2149. That would have put me into the very good tier, just goign after requirements. BUT i wasn't able to hold that rating, and fall down to around 2k. So back then i would have put myself into the good tier.
Today i'm able to keep my rating on the 1vs1 ladder. I gained consistency and got better, now i ranked myself into the very good tier.

Edited 6/30/2017 12:51:22

so u guys think it would be worth the time to write down like 500 players names in all diffrent cathegories? it would be fun and nice, yes, but it would take soooo many hours to just write the names down in all cathegories.. you are expecting to much of this :D

Nice that u appologized Phaeril, now just save us all even more time and actually open the spreadsheet and read the comments in this thread and i think you will find many more answers!

Cheers!

I already did it Kezzo. I don't see in the spreadsheet on what you judge, it is what I mean, even if yes, this spreadsheet is informative.

Edge, the rating of the ladder depend on many things, sometimes the first is at 2k, sometimes he is at 2,2k, so the elo is possible to judge only considering the period. More, all players do not play ladder in the same time, and you have to consider most of the top players don't play in ladder regularly. I think for many things, you judge on who is exposed. I already said I'm sure it's very hard to judge in a different way, but this one is pretty biased. For the rest, I'm ok. By the way, I think you underestimated some FC players, and overestimated the rest.

And about my results in CL. First, I always played the max tournaments and leads the teamgames (sometimes with Wazz, when we played together), 3 since a few seasons, 4 before, tu complete the lineup, and not always in my favorite templates, to complete the lineup, again.
Be aware it's hard to play a lot of competitive and long games (stalling sometimes, and teamgames are always long) without loose the flow. I do not seek excuses, and I think I'm in more than 50% win since a while in 1v1, I always won at least one tourney wathever the season and around 60-65% each season, that is at least very good when you play the div A each season, against very good players, as Wazz keep going to do with more regularity in 1v1, less in teamgames. I'm not talking about the last one I could not play seriously, and where it was even better for my mates. By the way, the old core of FC players is entirely retired 3 months ago, and it's official since a couple of weeks.

Edited 6/30/2017 15:39:52

I enjoyed the rankings. Fun read. Thx Edge. Dont let the haters bother you.

phaeril i've just checked it and it was first a game where you got booted on picks, then a remake where i got booted on turn 1 and then a 3rd game which we finished normally. All of those were back in 2015 during CL7 actually.

Back then i already started struggling with motivation to play the game competitively which is also the reason i was not playing this season besides all my work i had to do for school which was the main reason this season for not competing.

I was in my post just talking about the ongoing season for CL and there it was the way i've mentioned in my previous post.

Oh yes, I remember, it was on Battle Island right ? Something like a end of a season, we got hard work to play a game that got no more interest when the season ranking was obvious. I'm happy to see blitz is ok, kknd told me that recently (maybe one or two months), but I sometimes check some blitz games and it appeared to me the blitz activity up and down the last seasons.


I think I did not succeded to explain correctly my thoughts here, and I do not have enough credibility to keep trying, so I give up. Anyway, it doesn't really matter, and I'm not a hater here, and I used to write very long messages to explain myself, but sometimes it doesn't work. Maybe my english met its limits.

Edited 6/30/2017 17:25:16

After reading through the post and the comments I understand where everyone's views are coming from, but at the end of the day these are edges clan rankings, not offical warlight clan rankings (there is a difference!)

Even though there were some grammar mistakes that I had to to struggle through, really nice and interesting thread Edge! A lot of effort was put into it and I thank you for the list :)

these are edges clan rankings, not offical warlight clan rankings (there is a difference!)

The difference being that one exists, and one doesn't.

Edited 7/1/2017 18:40:10

nice work