The time has come - after WM and Apex, now WG has taken over the 1v1 Ladder:

1) Roo        2125
2) Verzehrer  2033
3) Mirror     2004
5) Tenshi     1995

Congratulation guys!

Edited 1/17/2014 22:19:40

Congrats guys :)

Something wrong with the laddder though: Hennns
I don't know hwo good he is or anything but he has 3 losses, and his best win is against the 19th ranked player. And he is #3 right now. This is just another reason the ladder rates players badly, something seriously needs to be done about this.

I'm good enough to be #3. also compere my results to the guys around me, it's not a big difference. also, 13/16 isn't good enough for 3rd-I don't see your logic :p

Grats to WG :)

Edited 1/18/2014 00:06:11

if you look this way:

Rank Name                                     Elo    +    - games score oppo. draws 
   1 dungaapex                               2270  436  238    13  100%  1651    0% 
   2 Roo                                     2128  133  113    34   76%  1899    0% 
   3 zibik21                                 2079  335  227     7   86%  1807    0% 
   4 TeddyFSB                                2060  133  119    30   70%  1886    0% 
   5 briskapex                               2041  227  197     9   67%  1919    0% 
   6 Verzehrer                               2035   83   76    81   74%  1820    0% 
   7 rento                                   2016  176  151    22   77%  1731    0% 
   8 Hennns                                  2014  218  173    16   81%  1700    0% 
   9 JSA                                     2011  127  116    31   68%  1854    0% 
  10 Mirror                                  2006  135  123    27   67%  1867    0% 

he played with weakest opponent, but his win ratio is very high

Yes, he his win ratio is high. Hennns, like I said, I don't know how good you are. You really don't see the logic? You beat no one better than the #19 ranked player. You have faced one player rated above 1900 and you lost. A player that has lost 3 games, and his best win was against the #19 should not be #3. I'm not gonna argue if you deserve it or not because you might be good enough for #1 for all I know. I simply mean that a player that has not beaten anyone above #19 should not be #3. Once you start playing the best players, we'll know where you belong, but if you stalled games you could be #1 with your best win being #19. That simply shouldn't be possible on the 1v1 ladder. Good luck with your next games, this is nothing personal against you, just a flaw in the ladder rating system in my opinion.

You really don't see the logic?
you misunderstood me, I simply said I disagreed with your logic (although maybe I wasn't that clear)
also you're looking on the wrong thing, a rank is some results compered to other results. you've have to look on what the other players score. ex. take Mirror the player currently ranked below me, of his last 4 games I've played 3 of the same players. I won against all 3 while Mirror won against 2 of them. my rank is not only about my results.



I'm not taking It personally, dw. it's actually an interesting discussion.

Krychu, how did you get that data? what's the + and - colons? also it's very interesting to see :)

No idea what + and - means, and here:
http://wiki.warlight.net/index.php/Ladder_Ranks_and_Ratings
is description how to run ranking simulation

JSA just because you'v never heard of a player doesn't deny him the right to be good. Well done Hennns!

Back to topic - WG rocks it!

Trolls gonna troll.

As I obviously say, I have nothing against Hennns, he is only my example player, I would say the same about anybody in this position.

Trolls gonna troll.

JSA going to jay.

congrats WG!

And Summer is doing a nice 2v2 ladder run at the moment as well.. I can only hope to end my run faster :)

stop arguing, Hennns. JSA rating > Elo rating..... you should know!

thanks krzychu and Brian :)