https://youtu.be/sEkNJrySb10


Assad did not use chemical weapons, he has no reason to, Assad is winning, why would he use chemical weapons to kill such a small group of people?

The rebels or anyone but assad is responsible for the chemical attacks.

Long Live Bashar al Assad.

Edited 4/11/2017 19:00:05

100% the Jews

Seems unlikely to be Assad, and not at all logical. Trump's attacks in Syria are an idiotic reaction before any form of investigation, and continues the US legacy of making up claims not backed by evidence in order to start robber wars. One can only wonder what action would've been appropriate by US logic in retaliation for their recent accidental air-strike that killed dozens of Syrian soldiers in Deir-ez-Zor.

Of course, the capitalists sitting on the arms, oil and other industries who finance the politicians' campaigns will be cheering as the corrupt USA starts yet another war so they can plunge their taxpayers further into debt and hand their money over to the arms capitalists. And the oil companies can prepare to rob the country of its resources when USA has installed a capitalist-friendly puppet regime.

Same thing happening every few years. The only way to achieve peace on Earth is to get rid of the parasitic global capitalism.

Yep, much of that sounds likely.

Or maybe a country in the UN likes enforcing the laws set forth? I'm crazy, I know.

It isn't capitalism since the government (an organization whose framework is held by the plebian masses but whose reins ultimately fall in the hands of the merchant class) is strongarming the competition (Syria and Russia) in favor of American globalist corporations. What we have here is a mixed model, an iron triangle between government and business (which is inevitable in a democracy where money determines public visibility).

The kind of mixed model a commie degenerate like Bla would propose would not be markedly different from the current American model.

Or maybe a country in the UN likes enforcing the laws set forth? I'm crazy, I know.

The attack came so quickly after the chemical incident and there's been no evidence so far it was Assad that was behind it. It's just as when USA 'enforced' the WMD rules on Iraq - claim there's evidence, attack them, when there isn't.
If an investigation found Assad to be behind the attack, retaliation may well be justified.

It isn't capitalism since the government (an organization whose framework is held by the plebian masses but whose reins ultimately fall in the hands of the merchant class) is strongarming the competition (Syria and Russia) in favor of American globalist corporations. What we have here is a mixed model, an iron triangle between government and business (which is inevitable in a democracy where money determines public visibility).

That's exactly capitalism. The bourgeoisie controls the state to act in their class interest. Nothing new there

The kind of mixed model a commie degenerate like Bla would propose would not be markedly different from the current American model.

You must be one of those fancy clairvoyant mind-readers. Why not tell us more about the model I would propose and how it differs from yours.

degenerate

sounds familiar

The truth is, fascists are the ultimate degenerate people, with their primitive mob mentality and criminal attacks on innocent people. Only messed up people feel a need to constantly invent scrapegoats so that they can project the misery of their own pathetic existence.

>implying I'm a Nazi

Read the classics on capitalism you retard. What we have is a corporate interventionist state. You aren't critiquing the free market; you are quibbling over the definition of capitalism. Semantics.

>Implying Marxists don't dress like degenerates

t. Pink haired SJW


>Mob mentality
Socialists of all flavors my friend. Your avatar is a literal collectivist ideology just switch "Jews" to "capitslists" and it's a slightly different revolution (given one saves Western Civilization).

Edited 4/12/2017 12:31:21

The attack came so quickly after the chemical incident and there's been no evidence so far it was Assad that was behind it. It's just as when USA 'enforced' the WMD rules on Iraq - claim there's evidence, attack them, when there isn't.

Iraq was a dirty scheme by the USA, but there were WMDs in the country. Are you saying the US had no way of knowing about them before invading?

it's foolish to praise any side of the conflict, all break many human rights in their own ways.

If an investigation found Assad to be behind the attack, retaliation may well be justified.

Retaliation? Not of a military or sanctions kind, since that just hurts the folk even more for a hard-to-see potential profit sometime way in the future. And this would just be hypocrisy - should China "retaliate" against itself?

topkek and stuff

I read the first three posts and agree--not convinced this was Assad.

I was at the Alt-Right protest against the Syria strikes on Saturday outside the White House.

I am all but completely off the Trump train. This was very disappointing.

Edited 4/14/2017 00:42:55

Yes. This was disappointing because Trump actually felt something for someone who wasn't white. And how about this for a reason for Assad to gas his own people.
He's a dictator who wanted to "teach them a lesson"
And now you have me DEFENDING Trump (you can search the forums for my post history, I hate the man but this strike was long overdue).