<< Back to Off-topic Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 30 of 34   1  2  Next >>   
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 09:30:12


Marigold Sunshine 
Level 59
Report
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 13:17:34


Remove Kebab
Level 58
Report
That's completely true.
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 13:42:37


Uru-salem
Level 20
Report
+1 OP
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 14:40:29


Marigold Sunshine 
Level 59
Report
that sounds like effort
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 14:50:57


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
atheists are the real theists, ye know?
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 16:32:38


Japanball
Level 56
Report
Atheism in a smaller nutshell: "I don't believe in God"
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 17:17:16


Japanball
Level 56
Report
How? Atheism is not believing in Godl
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 17:47:28


Japanball
Level 56
Report
FINE MOTHERFUCKER I DON'T BELIEVE IN A GOD AND MAY OR MAY NOT ASSERT THAT THERE IS NONE

Edited 2/10/2017 17:47:35
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 18:41:19


125ch209 
Level 58
Report
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 18:50:11


Japanball
Level 56
Report
Taggy, you talk about dogs being deleted.
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 19:14:01


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
ugh, do you deny Evolution Theory and the Shoah as well?
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 19:33:39


Japanball
Level 56
Report
No, the Holocaust and evolution are clear and go with science
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 19:35:28


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
so does the deletion of cats meow
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 20:07:33


Japanball
Level 56
Report
No
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 22:50:35


Remove Kebab
Level 58
Report
99% of atheists are atheists because they hate their life, I mean there may be some normal atheists that are attractive and aren't weird, but I have yet to see one in my day to day life.
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 23:51:01

madking321
Level 53
Report
What is this cancer.
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 23:51:07


Uru-salem
Level 20
Report
>holocaust
>real
>evolution
>backed up by any physical evidence

tippitis toppitis kek
atheism in a nutshell: 2/10/2017 23:51:41


Uru-salem
Level 20
Report
oh look who shows up madKANG, the token black of the forums.

Edited 2/10/2017 23:51:49
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 00:51:16


125ch209 
Level 58
Report
"just" a theory? Do you think Gravity and Heliocenticism are also "just" theories?
In science a theory is the highest and most advanced degree of explanation for a natural fenomena. It doesn't mean a mere hypothesis, like we can use in common language.
"Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge" wikipedia

Yaweh's creationism, Gaïa's creationism and the flying spaghetti monster's creationism are not theories.

It is not a matter of "believing" in it. It is a matter of whether you understand it or you don't, and whether you accept it or you don't.
The Theory of Evolution, in terms of knowledge, is as much a scientific fact as the Theory of Gravity.

People need to grow up.

Edited 2/11/2017 01:03:02
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 01:03:28


Marigold Sunshine 
Level 59
Report
i dont believe in gravity.
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 01:09:30


125ch209 
Level 58
Report
Well then maybe you'll make us a favor and float the fuck away
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 01:34:32


BUFFALO
Level 49
Report
i dont believe in gravity.


THANK GOD! You're absolutely right, the Earth is accelerating 'upward' at a constant rate of 9.8m/s^2.! Creating the illusion of gravity! Check out the links below!

https://wiki.tfes.org/Universal_Acceleration

https://www.warlight.net/Forum/170192-prove-earth-flat-challenge?Offset=30

Edited 2/11/2017 01:34:51
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 01:37:56


Uru-salem
Level 20
Report
>hur dur muh evolution b reel n shiet

*tips fedora
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 02:35:15


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
a theory is the highest and most advanced degree of explanation for a natural fenomena. It doesn't mean a mere hypothesis, like we can use in common language.


to be frank, theories can greatly vary in how upheld they are, but this is not a hardship for evolution.
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 04:24:31


BUFFALO
Level 49
Report
Uru-salem must have evolved from a bird or something cause he sure has a bird brain

buh dum tss
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 07:09:19


Japanball
Level 56
Report
No, birds are way smarter than him
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 07:15:00


Uru-salem
Level 20
Report
*tips fedora
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 16:03:20


Жұқтыру
Level 55
Report
no uru-salem did not evolve since evolve is to be not true so he has always been ladybird
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 17:42:52


125ch209 
Level 58
Report
I won't say that historical science is as solid as theories about the present.


There is no such thing as historical science, just science. Historical science is a bullshit concept invented by Ken Ham and his answer in genesis crew to basically reject every scientific fact that contradict his creationism fantasy.

Here is how valid Ken Ham historical science "were you there?" argument is:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LW06dav7KA&t=1s
atheism in a nutshell: 2/11/2017 18:18:59


125ch209 
Level 58
Report
The is no such thing as historical science. Everything we observe has already happened. When you look at the sun, you observe it as he was 8 min ago. And with this observation, and the scientific theories revealing the laws of nature, you can predict how it will be 8 min from now, and how it was 8 min before that.
When you look at the cosmic microwave background, you look at how the universe was 13.7 billion years ago. We can actually observe directly how the universe was at its infancy.
So again, making a difference between "historical" and "observable l" science makes no sense. Science just doesn't work that way

If historical science was a thing, then every scientific observation made at this precise moment, aka observable science, would fall under historical science the moment after. Making a distinction between historical science and observable science makes the assumption that the laws of nature can change between one moment and another. Except science operates on the premise that the laws of nature don't change. The most concrete evidence that this is a correct premise is that science works. We got to the moon, pluto, and everything we ever built was engineered on this premise

Edited 2/11/2017 18:31:52
Posts 1 - 30 of 34   1  2  Next >>