<< Back to General Forum | Discussion is locked - replying not allowed   Search

Posts 1 - 17 of 17   
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/28/2011 06:32:08


00Dev 
Level 55
Report
I just created a tourney for a free membership, and was going to post the link here, but can't figure out how to get a link to it. anyone know if that's possible, or if i can only foreward invites to ppl on my invite list?
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/28/2011 06:54:59

Fizzer 
Level 58

Warzone Creator
Report
Awesome that you're doing this!

Here's the link: http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?TournamentID=1617
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/28/2011 09:07:00


[中国阳朔]TexasJohn 
Level 35
Report
Ah. Joined. Was a bit curious how someone other than Fizzer could do this, so I was afraid it was a hoax. Cool thing to do man! What's the motivation behind this?
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/28/2011 10:39:10

emoose 
Level 3
Report
If I understand this correctly, the tournament champion gets a free membership.

I notice that there are participants who are already members, so would you give the free membership to the top-ranking non-member (assuming I understand correctly)?
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/28/2011 11:58:10


[中国阳朔] V 
Level 12
Report
Other than the host, no members have joined. Some are invited, but they haven't accepted (yet).

And yes, the champion should get a free memberhip paid by 00Dev.
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/28/2011 19:07:48


00Dev 
Level 55
Report
V - Precisely. I only Joined because I had to Join in order to foreward invites. The membership has been paid for, is sitting in my e-mail account, and will be awarded to the winner of this tourney. The reason is explained in the info for the tourney. Fizzer, you're the man cheers all
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/29/2011 01:04:15

emoose 
Level 3
Report
Sorry if it sounded like it, but I'm not trying to say members shouldn't be allowed to participate, and I had assumed 00Dev's participation was required anyways. I'm simply asking how the reward will be handled in the event that a member does win (I think there are 4 participating including 00Dev).

That aside, thank you 00Dev for doing this, and good luck to all participants.
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/29/2011 01:16:36


Troll 
Level 14
Report
After joining and forwarding the invites you can now decline the tournament if you want, 00Dev.
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/29/2011 03:00:08

Kantos
Level 60
Report
first battle but seeing other names... god help me, because many stronger players I know is beside me. The worst case they will fight me in my second, third, fourth battle... of course, if I manage to win in these battles U_u

ps: sorry for my bad english :P
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/29/2011 08:23:50


[中国阳朔]TexasJohn 
Level 35
Report
00Dev, I dig the idea. But such a small map, with 100 army neutrals? Yikes!
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/29/2011 09:27:02


The Yellow Team
Level 4
Report
If you want that membership John, you've got to earn it.
Tourney For Free Membership: 11/29/2011 18:27:56


00Dev 
Level 55
Report
i know. weird settings right? muahahah! just tryin to keep you on your toes!
Tourney For Free Membership: 1/14/2012 22:32:15

RvW 
Level 46
Report
00Dev, if you're reading this:
It took a while, but it looks like your tournament has finished. Somebody with a positively unpronounceable name [┌∩┐⎝◣_◢⎠┌∩┐](http://warlight.net/Profile.aspx?p=275048501) won. Congrats!
Tourney For Free Membership: 1/14/2012 23:03:13


00Dev 
Level 55
Report
Dear Mr Troll. you are not even trying to hide the fact that you are signed into an account created to clog this tournament by lowering the number of opponents, and raising your own chances. It is for this reason that you will not be awarded the Membership. For those interested, this is the game on which i am basing my decision.

http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?GameID=1782963

The "winner" of the tournament is playing an opponent who is in fact his own self. This was inevitable, considering the sheer number of fake accounts (40-50 I beleive.)

In Every other game he played in this tournament, he selected as starting spots two to three strategically placed clusters, consisting of at least 5-6 picks, which is appropriate for the three starting spots he will get. But in this game, he only selects four. Essentially the same four are selected by his "opponent", and then the "opponent" surrenders immediately.

I would appreciate other people's input in this. It seems open and shut to me, but i would still appreciate some feedback from some of you guys, Especaily you Fizzer, if you're reading this

As it stands I am am prepared to award the membership to the runner up, Tartan, but will wait a few days, lest I make a terrible mistake
Tourney For Free Membership: 1/14/2012 23:10:08

BishesUpInErr (AHoL)
Level 4
Report
it seems a bit fishy, but he did beat many other players in this tournament, so I'd give him the membership.
Tourney For Free Membership: 1/14/2012 23:32:26


szeweningen 
Level 60
Report
Well, that is the risk of making a tournament with a prize with such weird settings. Most membership tournaments with strat. 1vs1 or similar standard settings are much more competetive, then you don't have to think about fake accounts seeing all the non-member top players. Also Fizzer should be able to track IP, e-mail addresses and so on of those accounts. It'd seem like a whole lot of work to make 40 fake accounts, 40 reliable fake e-mail addresses and wear an IP mask every time you log on to different account...
Tourney For Free Membership: 1/14/2012 23:56:53


Wolfman100
Level 51
Report
I believe the host. I highly doubt a person who fought all the way to the finals would instantly surrender on turn 1 because he didnt get the picks he wanted
Posts 1 - 17 of 17   
Discussion is locked - replying not allowed