I haven't started to make it yet, but I'm hopefully going to make a 1,600 territory map, which would be the second largest.

Bwog... make sure the map merits that number of territories. This is by no means intended to offend but many before have claimed their intentions to make such a massive map only to have a miserable design or simply get overwhelmed by the level of effort involved.

I'd recommend discussing your idea for such a large map with one of the experienced mapmakers (not me) to get their opinion on its value. If it's like [this debacle](http://warlight.net/SinglePlayer.aspx?PreviewMap=9665) then I wouldn't recommend proceeding since it simply won't be worthwhile.

Again, I don't mean to offend... I just recommend vetting the idea out before spending the necessary effort.

No map is unesisary, there is no such thing as unecisery effort. Your imagination and map ideas are yours along. Make the map share it with overs. Dont let a warlight member telling you what to make. Its your map, your time, your ideas. No offense Richard

Unesisary?

There most certainly is such a thing as unnecessary effort. I know I would hate spending the time to make a massive 1600 territory map only to see it universally panned and rarely if ever used. That is a waste of time. I am sure I am not alone in that viewpoint. As such, discussing a map idea prior to investing your time and effort only makes sense.

Ok, I've forgot what **NSPGCOTGWHMAPALOMWLT50TTHNTPIAOLUBSITDPOWLRTTTTMMLSAONCOHOTMWOTDTWPSMTTCS** stands for...

Here's a new acronym for myself: **EMPERORMOROSOFMOROSIA. It stands for: Extreem Mal Persoon En Regerend Over Rechtmatige Morosia-grondbezittingen, Ook Regelmatig Onbevredigende Scheldpartijen Ontwijkende Fantastische Manager Over Regerings-Overeenkomsten, Samengevat: Inderdaad Almachtig.**

Ask RvW for the translation :)

Oh, replace **Mal** with **Magnifiek**. (**FIZZER! MAKE AN EDIT BUTTON!**)

Succinct translation: "I'm *very* self-confident". :p

Now I have 4 maps with 1206 territories. (I uploaded Veneto map with 581 territories)

There should be a very large reason to add me to this chart in the next day or so.

Haha, **big** reason.
And I wait with showing the new graph until almost all map-makers have an average rating.

can you update the graph now? now ⅔ of maps has avarage rating (not TBD or 0)

If you're going to update it, my third map is pending public with 100 territories.

I only have one map on public, but I'm going to get on that list. I'm working on my second map and I have ideas for a third map.

No map is unesisary, there is no such thing as unecisery effort. Your imagination and map ideas are yours along. Make the map share it with overs. Dont let a warlight member telling you what to make. Its your map, your time, your ideas. No offense Richard

spell check is not an unnecessary effort either... unesisary, unecisery, along/alone, overs/others, Dont, Its not to mention grammar...



can I make 3 duel knock-off maps and get on this graph...?

Wait, so the Nehterlands Map doesn't count as mine in your graph? That means that even when I finish my Terra Incognita map, I'll have to make another map to join the club?
Rats.

i have 3 and am working on 2

Okay, here's a new graph. It's a little outdated, that was because I wanted to add more but forgot it.



And I raised the bar for people to be featured in the graph. Because of the flood of new maps lately, my graph would have become less visible.

Currently, Fizzer is the best (rated) map builder, with Chaos as second and Muppet and Evreux not far behind.

Oh great, so now I have to make four maps. Gee, Moros, you're sure getting under my skin this evening... :-\

1 more and main the club yes