One, so were democrats

Yeah and so are most authoritarian/violent things on this list, and I'm just trying to make the point that Trump is conservative, not that Democrats are morally better.

America already has the draft, it just doesn't use it.

It has a draft framework* it does not have a draft. But I get what you mean. Point taken.

So is Obama. Try again.

as I said before I do not uphold Obama or the USA. And even if I did, what brings you to would say "Try again"?

He's been in the party for four years, and disagrees with a lot of what they want

hijacked the party

well yeah it'd be pretty odd if he was in the party for 162 years. And you have to agree with most things they say and be upheld by the commitee or else you're out. And what general policies does he disagree with much? Not on war, not on environment, a little on healthcare.

holds views antithetical to many party members (pro-gay marriage).

that's what you name? One small form of discrimination against a group that makes up less than 5% the population? This is what I mean, if this is what they make out to be important issues, then sure they're as different as night and day, but it's all about being "vocal". What is really the biggest split between them is ties with Russia.

https://www.isidewith.com/candidate-guide/donald-trump/foreign-policy/overthrow-of-assad

source: No, this would allow ISIS to control Syria

"We have to get rid of ISIS first. After we get rid of ISIS, we’ll start thinking about it. But we can’t be fighting Assad. And when you’re fighting Assad, you are fighting Russia, you’re fighting — you’re fighting a lot of different groups.

But we can’t be fighting everybody at one time."

what I said:He wasn't against overthrowing Assad, if that's what you mean, but only after Mashriq was done with.

Ideologically he might like war, but he hasn't been advocating for new ones

did Clinton? Wars come when they're disponsible.

Citation needed, goy

well more specifically then, just openly for bugging other countries, sanctions, and making resource-valuable countries either allied with either wrecked badly.

you're right, he'd be a better candidate if he thought healthcare was bad

this isn't about being better or worse, this is just two parties and candidates being pretty much the same