If you agree, check out the uservoice and submit your vote!

http://warlight.uservoice.com/forums/77051-warlight-features/suggestions/5201249-the-ability-to-assign-cards-to-slots

Thanks!

Nice Idea.

Bump. I know it's annoying doing that but this could be a really fun change!

Its vary rare that i vote on ideas but i have assigned 3 votes to this as its just Brilliant !

Have you thought about how some players can use this to their advantage. I suggest it's a practise game only setting.

Edited 12/16/2013 16:11:18

Apollo dont you think that players can already use Custom scenarios to their advantage if they really wanted to by creating 50 territories for 1 player and 1 territory for another.

for this reason Custom scenarios are always Practice anyway

Edited 12/16/2013 15:38:41

Not exactly, I'm sure I've come across many unfair ranked scenarios On the open games tab. I know that rp and diplo games can be unfair for the sake of the theme and realism. However
people do make them unfair for winning reasons.

But I do see what you mean. Im only saying that games unfair should always be practise, this is a strategy game.

hmm yes i just tested it. for some reason i thought custom scenarios where always practice

{rp} regularly play games where players can only use certain cards so this sort of set up would be great for us :)

Apollo, just don't join rigged or unfair games?

Yeah it is useful tool I suppose ;)

It's not me who's bothered, it's just that it creates bad players and piles of terrible, unfair games on the open games tab.

No more than usual, i don't think anyone joins custom scenario games without checking the settings do they? Loaded bonuses are a little harder to spot but if a game has a custom scenario surely people check where they will be starting...this is where the card info should be

You'd be surprised, new people to the site don't understand everything for one.