I think the West needs a civil war. It isn't important whether the right-wing wins or loses, because whoever wins will almost certainly have strength, which is what we need. We must ban outright Islam, "offer" to let blacks and druggies to leave, etc. Then, don't be content to sit back. Take the offensive. Invade and colonize Africa and the Middle East. Use propaganda and war fervor to keep it up. Kill millions. Become independent. Rule the world, like Britain and Europe once did.

Damn you and your bs! I'm becoming a muslim now

racist and tasteless

Witch hunting is illegal...

VOTE HIM DOWN!

I think the West needs a civil war

I think you need to stop your stupidity

It isn't important whether the right-wing wins or loses

What's important is that your section of the right wing doesn't win

because whoever wins will almost certainly have strength

Whoever wins is going to have to deal with the after effects of your civil war, which will sink your "west".

We must ban outright Islam

Whatever government that rises out of your ruins won't be powerful enough to

Take the offensive. Invade and colonize Africa and the Middle East.

You think Russia and China would let you do that? They'll be in Europe bringing the pain to your dilapidated, weakened and outdated army.

Use propaganda and war fervor to keep it up

You think by the end of your civil war, anyone would want to fight a war, let alone a race war?

Become independent.

Independence: collapsing the world in a genocidal war to "sav muh culturz"

Rule the world, like Britain and Europe once did.

Collapse into civil war and have a destroyed continent, like Europe once did.

''China would let you do that?''

Biotch please, Chinese army is too incompotent and outdated. Chinese army is just numbers.

It isn't important whether the right-wing wins or loses

What's important is that your section of the right wing doesn't win

haha +2.

Frain for all: would you rather have squiggles as the leader of your country, or your favourite of the far-right mob (not Paugers or The Lord, they have at least shred of sense in them).

I thought about it. On one hand, you've got folk wanting to ban Islaam and criticism of government, bringing back more "liberal" death penalties, like for children and for drugs and for spies, practically legalising murder, throwing away any human rights, bringing the dread of world war and overseas settlements, and killing all who promote thoughts against the ideology as "foreign agents in the infosphere front". Not to say just all-about foppishness.

And I think about Islaamish law.

*Death penalty (public beheading or stoning) for
**"apostates".
**those who have drugs (including alcohol).
**"sodomisers"
**women who have sex with more than one man.
**those who have sex before marriage
**12+ year olds doing violent crime
*Cutting the right hand for theives.
*Throwing away human rights.
*Legalising murder to shield a family's honour.
*Flogging wives that disobey their husbands (unless their husbands ordered to break Islaamish code)
*Systemish legal discrimination against those not Muslim.

Way too far-right Americans:
*Death penalty for
**Children.
**Those who have drugs (excluding alcohol of course)
**Spies and treason.
*Banning Islaam.
*Legalise murder to shield a business's "freedom".
*Ending of all public welfare and healthcare programmes.
*Curbed rights for blackskins.
*Throwing human rights away.
*Purposefully beginning world war with or without provocation of any kind, killing millions. This is worse than the successorship, as they only see war fit if in shield(of their lives or of the Islaamish faith's pride).
*For wielding core weapons much more loosely.