Dreadgroup: 4
Non-Dreadgroup: 0

I hold the position that the group, Black Lives Matter, is a dread(terror)group. They have committed a number of dread attacks in America, and are probably a bigger threat than Al-Qaeda or ISIS at this point to America.

And no Cata, unless you start calling Russia the RF, China the PRC and Germany the FRG, I'll keep on calling America America.

Edited 7/9/2016 15:56:41

ya i agree

I think they had good intentions at the beginning. But like Feminism, it got hijacked by a more hateful idea. It is a hate group, and a terrorism spawns from it.

Reluctant yes.

Think I've said something along the lines before but here goes...

BLM has good intentions, but its poor organisation means that anyone can yell BLM, do stupid things and suddenly they represent the movement. That being said, the violent, disruptive, divisive, hateful and to a degree, racist arm of the BLM movement is fairly large and the most prominent, and they're the reason why the group takes so much flak.

BLM keenly exacerbates its set of 'Race politics' at every opportunity it gets, we see more arguments over All Lives Matter vs Black Lives matter than the actual matter of police reform, which is a shame.

A great part of its positive discriminatory like agenda widens the race division. It is definitely a divisive and often a hate group. Top that with some of the violence from its most hardcore members and it becomes synonymous with domestic terrorism.

Off to bed.

Edited 7/9/2016 15:55:09

kek'd

It never had good intentions.

Why Black Lives Matter? Why not All Lives Matter?

Edited 7/9/2016 18:54:51

^

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/02/23/black-lives-matter-co-founder-all-lives-matter-a-racial-slur/

Authoricucks trying to be edgy

Well fine, instead of dismissing his opinions, let's look at why they're shit.

BLM: Responsible for about a dozen or less killings
Police: Responsible for hundreds of killings

If BLM deserves gassing, riot police deserve the same.

>anarchist
>calls others edgy
K


>advocates for killing people to send a message
>isn't edgy
K

Edited 7/14/2016 02:15:21

What? If you call BLM a dreadgroup, that's just really belittling to what's conventionally known as dreadgroups. Has it killed any politicians? Have they raided towns in their pogroms? Have they indiscriminately (but still targeted) bombed folk? Has there ever been a shootout with the BLM? The list goes on and on, but I think it's pretty off to call BLM a dreadgroup.

This is getting ridiculous. I'm just going to give Colonel Sanders a call and we'll get the KKK on the case. That way, we have the Ying Yang balance going. Pro-Black groups and Pro-White groups. There must be balance.

There was a shootout.