I made the reference purposefully you idiot.

I just called myself an idiot. What an idiot!

Or you know, just put a dick on one sign and a pussy on another. Short, succinct and less expensive.

Jew

In response to the OP, here's my stance on this: rather than call it the Men's restroom or Women's restroom, rename to the biologically male restroom, and biologically female restroom.

A man is a human with a penis and a Y chromosome. A woman is a human with an extra hole in her body and 2 X chromosomes. It's not grammar's fault that people can't wrap their heads around what they physically are and what they feel they are. There is nothing wrong with the current label for restrooms.

There's nothing really wrong with changing it, either, except for the mammoth money waste.

Some people feel that this is a massive part of their identity, and as such believe they are one gender while biologically the other. To what I believe is a small minority within this group, they take the limitations on not being able to use the restroom they identify with as being the equivalent of a evangelical christian only being allowed to enter a mosque or some other ridiculous analogy that would piss off the people involved. As such, since I am generally in favor of the terms:"Majority rule, minority rights", and risking a rise in sexual assaults to not be worth satisfying this minority group's right to identify with themselves, but figuring the monetary cost while prohibitive, is actually worth ending the issue, my solution is just to change the sign.

Funny thing is, I'm exactly the opposite on gay rights. I especially dislike people who cite religious rights as an excuse for their bigotry. Why I'm so opposite on similar issues is an enigma even to me.
Anyway, that's another flame war for another day...
It seems North Carolina's gonna have to repeal this law. There economy has been wrecked, it's probably going to get worse.

Some people feel that this is a massive part of their identity, and as such believe they are one gender while biologically the other...figuring the monetary cost while prohibitive, is actually worth ending the issue, my solution is just to change the sign.

No. It's not worth it, to pander to some definite minority loons. If you really want to pander, then how about checking the sale of alcohol to Muslims and barring it if they are (as it is against their faith)? Although Muslims as a whole would like that, no! Not worth the hassle. They're just going to have to deal with it, same as 2.5 million Muslims will have to deal with no governmental barring of gay marriage or transexists being pandered to here, offensive to the Christian and Islamic (probably Hindu and Jewish, too; being gay is criminal in India) faith.