==================== GeneralPE pictures ====================







============================================================

Edited 3/14/2016 15:47:33

At least TeamGuns is more balanced than any modern news network

http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/949/093/03d.jpg

I love how on the other threads, people defended Trump and Cruz, but no one here seems to want to defend Hillary

only 3 more slots:

https://www.warlight.net/MultiPlayer?GameID=10729336

===============================GeneralPE===============================



=======================================================================

@GeneralPE

It's impossible to defend her. Even if you're a democrat, she's just a phony evil person that will lie about anything to get elected. I love her liberal shift for the nomination to counter bernie, if she gets it I bet 50 bucks we'll see a shift to the center again.

Really, I'd be ashamed to be a Clinton's supporter.

Edited 3/14/2016 18:32:17

@TeamGuns
if you had to choose between trump and hillary, who would you vote for?

Of course he would vote for Clinton. That's an easy question.

Yea, clinton for sure, but that's pretty much because of the alternative... Against Cruz or Rubio I'd probably just not vote. Against Kasich I'd definetly vote for kasich.

Edited 3/14/2016 20:06:11

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgttkWQj6D0

Stand with Rand and stand anti-Clinton!

Edited 3/14/2016 20:16:28

You know, just a frain to Americans - why is Clinton disponsible for some small-scale attack on a country that was wrecked into chaos in 2011 (with great support in America)?

Because Democrats?

Edited 3/14/2016 20:19:22

@{BM}-Paugers

We'll have one soon, as I said. Let's just avoid getting ahead of ourselves and forget about hillary.


@Belgian Gentleman

Rand is a smart guy. I happen to disagree with him in many issues (climate change being the bigger one), but he has good arguments to defend his libertarian views. And I'd rather spend one hour discussing issues with libertarians, then 5 minutes with hardline conservatives. I just can't support those.


@Жұқтыру

She's responsible for wrecking that country on the first place...

Edited 3/14/2016 20:21:10

Rand may be a good candidate but he got little support.

Edited 3/14/2016 20:22:58

One of the few smart republicans I have to say. The problem is that he's not conservative enough, good thing he hasn't corrupted himself to get nominated.

Edited 3/14/2016 20:22:05

Stand with Rand and stand anti-Clinton!

+1. My man.

I may just write in Rand Paul during the primary and general election.

The problem is that he's not conservative enough, good thing he hasn't corrupted himself to get nominated.

I actually think he's the real definition of conservatism. Any conservative who says we should grow the military is actually just a neoconservative, something that only came into existence during the tail end of the cold war.

Edited 3/14/2016 20:24:42

One of the few smart republicans I have to say. The problem is that he's not conservative enough, good thing he hasn't corrupted himself to get nominated.

A corrupted Rand Paul would be better than all the other Republicans, unless he's ridiculously corrupted.

I actually think he's the real definition of conservatism. Any conservative who says we should grow the military is actually just a neoconservative, something that only came into existence during the tail end of the cold war.

He is definitely not conservative. He wants to legalise so many things, and to lower government control...this is libertarian. Conservatism wants right and more government control/laws.