That or because he got beat by me:O

"5) You make a comment that you also cannot back up. I believe CORP are better in a strategic point of view."

I challenge anyone in CORP to beat me in a best of 7 series on a strategic template.

I don't much care about the childish feud between Plat and the handful of Corp members involved, but I honestly do find it amusing if you really believe the players in CORP are strategically superior to those in 101st.

Obviously both clans have their weaker and stronger players, but I'm quite confident that 101st stronger players are much better than CORPs.

I'm not making baseless claims though, merely challenging anyone in CORP that wishes to defend that statement to attempt to do so.

Edited 1/28/2016 02:24:43

Join AOE

@MasterOfWarZone: not sure what your main is (Omniscient?) but I'm down for that (invite vitriol if you want to be strict). Seems like you're a solid player. Any template works. Could even rotate if you'd like.

Edited 1/28/2016 02:49:31

Average Skill - 101st are better.
Total Skill - CORP are better.
Median Skill - Around the same.

Stop arguing with each other.

What exactly is "Total Skill"? Just a straight sum of some sort of rating? Or based on the best players (Dr. Walter Ego/Chancho/mm/Ink/etc. vs Omniscient/Platinum/etc.)?

I can become good at 1v1 games and join one of the top clans like 101st and CORP. Who knows the sky is the limit. But I guess this thread should be destroyed as no goods has come of it.

You don't have to be good to get into CORP; 101st has slightly higher standards (or used to? I mean, they rejected me at one point in the past...).

If you have a lot of skill, you might be able to think about clans like Apex and WG. If you're not among the top few but still pretty good (top 200 range in the 1v1 ladder, usually a bit higher), you have a shot at M'Hunters/ILLUMINATI/Appalachian Warlight Federation/etc.

All the best clans are fairly elitist but once you step down a tier or two you'll find clans with decent players (top 50-100 on the 1v1 ladder, which is the case for CORP) that don't really require you to be amazing before you join.

Edited 1/28/2016 04:27:14

"join one of the top clans like 101st and CORP."

That'd be more like Apex and [20]. I'm fairly sure I'm the only person in 101st (aside from alts of people in Lynx or Masters) that's been top 20 on the 1v1 ladder, let alone top 10, only two others that I am aware of have been top 50.

101st is far from elitist.

Edited 1/28/2016 04:33:41

How can I join this ladder? I dont know many clans just thought 101st and corp where top clans.

https://www.warlight.net/LadderSeason?ID=0

You can purchase the "mega strategy pack" (not recommended) or reach level 47 to join the 1v1 ladder. I'd suggest leveling, as you're very, very unlikely to do well on the ladder without leveling at least one account to level 47 anyway (levels are by no means an indication of skill, but it typically takes far more games for someone to become decent even if they are a fast learner than it does for them to reach level 47).

^^^
Level 48 (not 47)

There are some third-party ladders that you can join without being L48+, however (at least IPL, but that's mostly because I run it). I think you also unlock the Real-Time Ladder at or before L45.

Sure it's 48?

https://www.warlight.net/wiki/Levels

That says 47, I have no clue beyond what that says though, all the accounts I've played on ladder with were old grandfathered membership accounts that have access to everything regardless of level.

It's a mistake, it was fixed according to one of the last updates.... it's lvl 48

I like ffa, I like to trole in game chat, I like games when people play under 2 mins. I like muti-attack!

Wanna play a game?

Sure Thomas!!!!