<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 19 of 19   
WARNING: 3/15/2011 08:06:25

bmurf84 
Level 5
Report
just said id leave a quick warning about a player called Jay Money,keep an eye out for this guy,he will go over the boot time repeatedly,but if losing will then boot you the second you go over,even if he has not yet committed his own orders! then of course he will get you banned for letting him know what you think of him! ;-)
WARNING: 3/15/2011 16:01:56


Musiq2020
Level 2
Report
What a cheap bastard!
WARNING: 3/15/2011 18:42:24


Duke 
Level 5
Report
post the game or it didn't happen.
WARNING: 3/15/2011 19:03:26


Knoebber 
Level 54
Report
stop complaining about boots.
WARNING: 3/16/2011 00:12:20


Dansonno
Level 2
Report
http://warlight.net/MultiPlayer.aspx?GameID=1241998

I'm not complaining, but merely pointing out what a noob monty is. If I were you, I would blacklist this noob. Who want's to play with some one who'll boot you a microsecond over the boot timer?
WARNING: 3/16/2011 00:59:24

Dragons 
Level 56
Report
wow
WARNING: 3/16/2011 21:53:47

bombfrog 
Level 4
Report
I have also had problems with Jay Money.

He was losing a game so started taking exactly 5 minutes to play each move (to slow the game right down), presumably with the hope that I'd surrender because it was taking too long. He went a bit over the 5 minutes so I booted him and he started calling me a cheater and shouting at me etc.

So, I told him to get lost and called him an asshole (I think?), so he said he was going to report me to Fizzer and get me banned for cursing, lol.

Just avoid him.
WARNING: 3/21/2011 23:38:52

Jay Money
Level 55
Report
First of all, if you have a problem with using the whole boot timer then i suggest that you don't create a game with a 5 minute boot timer. Secondly, there is nothing wrong with booting if one is to go over the boot timer...the boot timer is there for a reason....so don't go over or if you do than you better give a warning first so that the other players know you are planning on making a move
WARNING: 3/21/2011 23:45:45

Jay Money
Level 55
Report
oh and musiq2020, i am reporting you for violating the terms of this forum. Obviously you did not read the rules before posting your comment about me.
WARNING: 3/22/2011 01:50:48


NecessaryEagle 
Level 56
Report
If musiq gets banned for that S*** that's just ridiculous. His post should maybe be removed, but It's not slander because it happened
WARNING: 3/22/2011 17:36:19


Duke 
Level 5
Report
What ridiculous settigns. 5 minute autoboot but then you allow any player to boot after 3 minutes. What's the point of that?? It's like a set-up to get players to assume they have 5 minutes so you can boot at 3 minutes.

Don't play games with thos esettigns people.
WARNING: 3/22/2011 17:52:49


crafty35a 
Level 3
Report
All these threads are making me hope that direct boot gets abolished for real-time games.
WARNING: 3/22/2011 18:15:37


Duke 
Level 5
Report
How about abolishing it for games with autoboot on (make it an either or rather than cumulative option). Otherwise it's just confusing to players who think they have time. I'm okay with a shorter Vote to boot (although there should be an option to disable VTB when the game gets down to 2 players or teams).
WARNING: 3/22/2011 18:38:33

Jay Money
Level 55
Report
Hate to break the news to you Eagleblast, but Musiq2020 deserves to get banned. Read the rules. Rule number one: be respectful to other players at all times. Rule number two: offensive language will not be tolerated. Therefore, Musiq2020 violated the two and only rules of this forum. That is not acceptable and must be reported.
WARNING: 3/22/2011 18:56:49


Daryl
Level 42
Report
Musiq Wont care he's been inactive for nearly a week
WARNING: 3/22/2011 19:17:26


Duke 
Level 5
Report
"offensive language" is a misnomer, especially on a simulated battle site -- I'd rather see a something descriptive of the types of language that isn't permitted. The NY Times editorial Friday had a description of UCLA's policy (which it emphasized had to be balanced against free speech concerns):

"We do not tolerate acts of discrimination, harassment, profiling or other harm to individuals on the basis of expression of race, color, ethnicityā€¯ and other traits."


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/opinion/18fri2.html?ref=editorials


I like that a lot better than something silly like you can't use "offensive language" or worse, trying to ban all words you can't say on the public radio.
WARNING: 3/22/2011 23:54:47

WL Fanatic 
Level 8
Report
Doesn't it say *excessive* offensive language? Maybe not.
WARNING: 3/23/2011 15:15:49


Duke 
Level 5
Report
Fuckin A it does! good catch WLF. Now what constitutes excessive offensive language for a New Yorker?
WARNING: 3/25/2011 21:26:54


myhandisonfire 
Level 54
Report
JayMoney,

do you consider booting people for the win respectful?
Posts 1 - 19 of 19