<< Back to Map Development Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 8 of 8   
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 13:39:55


Kain
Level 57
Report
hey, short question - shall I describe 379-territories map as a medium or large? Are there any official guidelines for that issue?
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 13:41:31

[NL] Lucas
Level 59
Report
I would say medium
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 14:54:31

[wolf]japan77
Level 57
Report
When I think of Large I think 500+
So medium

small 2-100
Medium 100-500
Large 500-1000
Too Big for anything but 40 person diplos 1000+

Edited 11/23/2015 14:54:39
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 14:58:37


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
Anything over 300 is large IMO.
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 15:04:17

[wolf]japan77
Level 57
Report
But you can't throw 40 person diplos on a mere 300 territories.
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 15:23:15


ChrisCMU 
Level 60
Report
^That is your definition of large?

I would say large is anything that is too big to play 3v3 strategically. Rise of Rome is not even 300 territories and I would say it is on the upper end of what you'd call strategic.
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 15:35:10


Kain
Level 57
Report
Ok, thx for your help, ill stick to medium then
379 territories - is it large or medium: 11/23/2015 18:55:53


skunk940 
Level 58
Report
I would say that small is 100 or less, medium is between 100 and 1000, large is 1000 +
Posts 1 - 8 of 8