<< Back to General Forum   Search

Posts 1 - 15 of 15   
limit change: 2/19/2011 23:40:14


NecessaryEagle 
Level 56
Report
I'd like to see some sort of consensus.......

I personally think that non-paying members should be able to have at least 6 invites instead of 5.....

anyone else? member opinions would be more effective, so please comment
limit change: 2/20/2011 00:06:40


Perrin3088 
Level 44
Report
+1
limit change: 2/20/2011 00:32:50


I <3 GawithApricot
Level 3
Report
6 in multi and NO LIMIT IN SINGLE. I created a nice (I think :P) scenario and I can't even test it because I can ony "invite" 4 AI's to game...
limit change: 2/20/2011 00:38:43


NecessaryEagle 
Level 56
Report
agreed
limit change: 2/20/2011 01:09:06


Perrin3088 
Level 44
Report
Imho, AI's shouldn't apply to the limit at all. IE, a game could have 6 players +2 ai's created by a free player.. but..
limit change: 2/20/2011 05:26:38


Polaris 
Level 55
Report
I imagine it's five because warlight has a large community of players that ONLY play 3v3's on big poland. This restriction would force them(or a few of them) to upgrade so that they may have frequent games as they do now.
limit change: 2/20/2011 05:37:16


crafty35a 
Level 3
Report
Spikeknights makes a good point. It's great to want to improve things for the non-members, but the line has to be drawn somewhere, and we can't forget that the whole point of limiting features is to entice people to become members. I'm not necessarily arguing against raising the invite limit -- I'm just saying that maybe we should give Fizzer some time to see how things are going before making that decision.
limit change: 2/20/2011 06:17:47

GodlessKing
Level 54
Report
I was curious since so many members love playing 3v3. Why not make this a payable option but for a much smaller price? For instance, to allow unlimited spots(or 6 spots), pay 5-10 bucks or something. Not sure what the price would be but it's quiet a bit down from the 30$ for lifetime membership and would keep some players sticking around. I for instance will pay 5$ to be able to make 3v3 games as that is all I play.
limit change: 2/20/2011 06:36:28


crafty35a 
Level 3
Report
Now that is an interesting suggestion - offering "a la carte" premium options! Almost like buying a text messaging plan from your cell provider that allows a certain number of texts per month for a few dollars monthly fee.
limit change: 2/20/2011 09:47:55


Perrin3088 
Level 44
Report
that would be more of a micro-payments idea, similar to many modern mmo's that are free to play..
limit change: 2/20/2011 10:08:58

The Impaller 
Level 9
Report
I feel like with the large number of people who want to be able to play in 3v3s and don't or wouldn't otherwise play Warlight, it would be a wise decision to allow non-members to play in 3v3s for the sake of maintaining that community of players, who can invite others to the site as well as potentially become members later.

I would say 6 makes a lot more sense than 5 as the maximum number of players non-members can invite, and I agree that in a single player scenario, it should be any number.
limit change: 2/20/2011 12:51:47

Gorath
Level 26
Report
I agree...at least for single player. I'm working on beating the insane level. I've been practicing via that template, but with some options tweaked. Now, I can't even invite the amount of AI's that are in the insane level.
limit change: 2/20/2011 20:18:42

Fizzer 
Level 58

Warzone Creator
Report
By popular demand, the invite limit has been raised from 5 to 6.

The official announcement is up on the blog: http://blog.warlight.net/index.php/2011/02/maximum-number-of-invites-by-non-members-has-been-raised-to-6/
limit change: 2/20/2011 20:21:05


NecessaryEagle 
Level 56
Report
THANK YOU

less complaining now maybe??? :)
limit change: 2/20/2011 20:41:31


I <3 GawithApricot
Level 3
Report
Thanks a lot Fizzer but I'm repeating: NO LIMIT IN SINGLE PLAYER!
Posts 1 - 15 of 15