Review by
Reichtangle on 3/18/2023.
This is a wonderful map, good territory count and perfect for basically any setting from 1700 to modern day.
However, there are some issues I have with it which prevent me from rating 5 stars.
Firstly, Ljubljana and Gibraltar are spelled wrong.
Second, some territories in Croatia have incorrect names. The "Zagreb" territory doesn't actually have Zagreb in it, same for "Kvarner-Lika-Karlovac" not having Karlovac.
Other issues I have are just personal preferences I have. Firstly, I appreciate that the map is made so old Imperial borders can easily be implemented. However there is a problem here, as Salzburg, a territory within Austria, used to be independent from it. It not being its own bonus here automatically means any scenario set before the early 1800's cannot be correct without bonus gore, which kinda sucks. A similar issue happens because Istria is not its own bonus. It was not a part of Croatia for many, many years.
Otherwise, amazing map.
-Reichtangle.
Response by map creator
RainB00ts on 3/19/2023
Thank you for bringing the spelling mistakes to my attention, they will be fixed. As for Salzburg, it's just one territory so I didn't want to make it an individual bonus. As for Istria and the others (and this also applies to Salzburg): there have been a lot of border changes since the end of the 17th century and it would be difficult if not impossible to incorporate them into the map given the territory limit. I did not set out to make a map that included all possible modern historical political divisions (note that North America is also not cut in such a way). Rather, it is a modern map with some bare-bones adaptabilities for 19th and 20th century scenarios, so I only focused on imperial borders from the First World War period as scenarios prior to the First World War are generally unpopular. But thank you for this feedback.
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Review by
chris on 3/28/2023.
good map
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Review by
01Zoli
on 4/25/2023.
Great map.
1 out of 1 person found this review helpful.
Review by
Aaron on 4/27/2023.
nice
1 out of 1 person found this review helpful.
Review by
TheMuffinMan on 12/29/2023.
Wonderful map. I can't give it 5 stars due to numerous occasions (especially in western North America) where seemingly bordering territories do not have a connection or where seemingly non-bordering territories do have a connection.
Response by map creator
RainB00ts on 12/29/2023
I know, since I added in a bunch of new territories there are some broken connections that I am working on fixing. They should all be fixed within one or two updates.
1 out of 1 person found this review helpful.
Review by
Giannis Kaltapanidis on 3/19/2023.
Needs a lot of strategy.
1 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Old Nick on 8/29/2023.
good game
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Koba on 3/12/2024.
A few errors with connections, some bordering regions that should connect but don't, and some regions that don't border, but act like they do. Apart from that, excellent map.
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful.
Review by
pronunciationphreak on 3/13/2023.
This map violates my intellectual property (https://www.warzone.com/Map/41515-North-Atlantic) and therefore must be taken off the site immediately. five stars though great map
Response by map creator
RainB00ts on 4/29/2023
Thanks.
3 out of 8 people found this review helpful.
it is nice but I want base as 5
Response by map creator
RainB00ts on 3/10/2023
This is a place where you review the map, not the settings of a particular game.
2 out of 8 people found this review helpful.
