Review by
yinchiao on 1/10/2022.
Nice historicity. Perhaps as a reflection of the farflung nature of the empires represented, the different segments of the map seem isolated and independent of each other, and moving from one corner of the map to another can be a long slow slog. I suppose that's how it was in 1600, too.
8 out of 9 people found this review helpful.
Review by
TresEspadas on 1/23/2022.
one of the best!
4 out of 4 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Uncle Jimmy on 1/22/2022.
Great map! Found a missing connection between Cuenca and Valencia.
3 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Mjoth on 5/28/2022.
Beautifully made map, a very fun play.
2 out of 2 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Bob on 1/11/2022.
Nice map.
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Juanda Restrepo Duran on 2/26/2022.
Not too small, not too big, no missing connections between neighbouring territories (albeit you should add one that would connect the Philippines with Mexico), relatively balanced bonuses. Only issues (on naming and drawing,) I have spoted are in Colombia, 1. At the time you would name it Popayán, not Cali (and by that time, you'd really have at least 4 gobernations, Antioquia to the northwest of the territory Cali comprises here) 2. Borders for Bogotá and *Popayán* are incorrectly drawn, *Popayán occupied the west of the modern country and the southeast while territories that belonged to Bogotá mostly comprised the center and mid-east of the modern country, 4. "Gobernation/Gobernacy of", should be added to Cartagena, *Popayán* and *Antioquia, 5. Bogotá should be renamed "Kingdom of New Graanda". Do forgive me these annoying corrections (surely we could do them for the whole map) which I've done as a Colombian, because anyways they don't make me think this isn't an excellent map
2 out of 3 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Aaron Gagnon on 3/3/2022.
nice
1 out of 1 person found this review helpful.
Review by
skarabaios on 7/29/2024.
Beautiful!
1 out of 1 person found this review helpful.
Review by
Aaron on 8/16/2022.
nice
0 out of 0 people found this review helpful.
Review by
Demon++ on 1/14/2022.
.
2 out of 8 people found this review helpful.